jury was reversible error (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

jury was reversible error in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1905–1996 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Kiner v. Stategreen
indctapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996We noted that “[i]n additional cases, the supreme court has applied the harmless error rule upon refusal of a jury’s request without discussing whether the defendant’s counsel was present.” Kiner, 643 N.E.2d at 956 (emphasis added).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Deming v. State neutral
ind · 1956
2 sentences

1979He relies upon Miles v. State (1944), 222 Ind. 312 , 53 N.E.2d 779 ; Dean v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 568 , 130 N.E.2d 126 and Deming v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 282 , 133 N.E.2d 51 .

1979He relies upon Miles v. State (1944), 222 Ind. 312 , 53 N.E.2d 779 ; Dean v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 568 , 130 N.E.2d 126 and Deming v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 282 , 133 N.E.2d 51 .

21977–1979
Miles v. State green
ind · 1944
2 sentences

1979He relies upon Miles v. State (1944), 222 Ind. 312 , 53 N.E.2d 779 ; Dean v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 568 , 130 N.E.2d 126 and Deming v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 282 , 133 N.E.2d 51 .

1979He relies upon Miles v. State (1944), 222 Ind. 312 , 53 N.E.2d 779 ; Dean v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 568 , 130 N.E.2d 126 and Deming v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 282 , 133 N.E.2d 51 .

21977–1979
Dean v. State of Indiana green
ind · 1955
2 sentences

1979He relies upon Miles v. State (1944), 222 Ind. 312 , 53 N.E.2d 779 ; Dean v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 568 , 130 N.E.2d 126 and Deming v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 282 , 133 N.E.2d 51 .

1979He relies upon Miles v. State (1944), 222 Ind. 312 , 53 N.E.2d 779 ; Dean v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 568 , 130 N.E.2d 126 and Deming v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 282 , 133 N.E.2d 51 .

21977–1979
Davison v. Williams green
ind · 1968
2 sentences

1978Plaintiff’s argument misconstrues the proper employment of safety legislation in negligence litigation, however, in Indiana proof of the violation of a safety regulation creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence. *552 Davison v. Williams, (1968) 251 Ind. 448 , 242 N.E.2d 101 .

1978Plaintiff’s argument misconstrues the proper employment of safety legislation in negligence litigation, however, in Indiana proof of the violation of a safety regulation creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence. *552 Davison v. Williams, (1968) 251 Ind. 448 , 242 N.E.2d 101 .

11978–1978
People v. Knapp green
mich · 1879
2 sentences

1977Holding that the presence of the bailiff with the jury was reversible error, the court quoted from The People v. Knapp, (1879) 42 Mich. 267 , 3 N.W. 927 : “Whether he [the officer] does or does not converse with them [the jury], his presence to some extent must operate as a restraint upon their proper freedom of action and expression.

1977Holding that the presence of the bailiff with the jury was reversible error, the court quoted from The People v. Knapp, (1879) 42 Mich. 267 , 3 N.W. 927 : “Whether he [the officer] does or does not converse with them [the jury], his presence to some extent must operate as a restraint upon their proper freedom of action and expression.

11977–1977
Messick v. Midland Railway Co. neutral
ind · 1891
1 sentence

1905Co. (1891), 128 Ind. 81, 85 , Diezi v. Hammond Co. (1901), 156 Ind. 583, 588 , and many others of the same class, and that taking the case from the jury was reversible error.

11905–1905
Diezi v. G. H. Hammond Co. neutral
ind · 1901
1 sentence

1905Co. (1891), 128 Ind. 81, 85 , Diezi v. Hammond Co. (1901), 156 Ind. 583, 588 , and many others of the same class, and that taking the case from the jury was reversible error.

11905–1905

Where else courts name it

IN 6 (1905–1996) CA 6 (1958–2020) MD 4 (1988–2016) IL 4 (1981–1992) AL 3 (1913–1977) FL 3 (1968–1995) MI 3 (1921–1985) NC 3 (2006–2010) PA 2 (1937–1998) TX 2 (1944–1980) OR 2 (2016–2021) OK 2 (1949–1960) GA 2 (1971–1992) LA 2 (1975–1994) ID 2 (1904–1947) MS 2 (2010–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check