lawful arrest exception (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

lawful arrest exception in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Fentress v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2007 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2017
2 sentences

2017Fentress v. State, 863 N.E.2d 420, 423 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).

2010See Fentress v. State, 863 N.E.2d 420, 423 (Ind.Ct.App.2007).

22
Roger Wilkinson v. State of Indianagreen
indctapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020Wilkinson v. State, 70 N.E.3d 392, 403 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).

11
Starks v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008Starks v. State, 846 N.E.2d 673, 683 (Ind. Ct.App.2006) (“[A] search incident to a lawful arrest is an exception to the warrant • requirement.”), trans. denied 860 N.E.2d 588 (Ind.2006).

11
VanPelt v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006VanPelt v. State, 760 N.E.2d 218, 222 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Kevin M. Clark v. State of Indiana green
ind · 2013
1 sentence

2017Clark, 994 N.E.2d at 260 . [17] A search incident to a lawful arrest is an exception to the warrant requirement under the Fourth Amendment.

12017–2017
Gutermuth v. State green
ind · 2006
1 sentence

2008Starks v. State, 846 N.E.2d 673, 683 (Ind. Ct.App.2006) (“[A] search incident to a lawful arrest is an exception to the warrant • requirement.”), trans. denied 860 N.E.2d 588 (Ind.2006).

12008–2008
Sizemore v. State green
indctapp · 1974
2 sentences

1978Sizemore v. State (1974), 159 Ind.App. 549 , 308 N.E.2d 400 .

1978Sizemore v. State (1974), 159 Ind.App. 549 , 308 N.E.2d 400 .

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

CA 8 (1969–2024) LA 6 (1975–1989) PA 6 (1983–2026) IN 6 (1978–2020) OH 5 (1999–2026) KS 5 (1997–2020) TX 5 (2006–2016) MO 4 (1974–1990) MD 4 (1973–2012) IL 4 (1974–2007) SC 4 (2014–2023) FL 4 (1985–2018) NJ 3 (2002–2020) NC 3 (2010–2017) WA 3 (1985–1993) NY 3 (1972–2019) MT 3 (1978–2001) CT 2 (1992–1993) WI 2 (1981–2000) AZ 2 (2018–2019) HI 2 (1983–1984) ND 2 (1980–1993) WV 2 (1975–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check