Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1974–1990 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pier v. SCHULTZ
green
2 sentences1990Co. (1900), 154 Ind. 49 , 55 N.E. 1021 ; and (3) The entrapment-affirmative control of the instrument test —Pier v. Schultz (1962), 243 Ind. 200 , 182 N.E.2d 255 . 1990Co. (1900), 154 Ind. 49 , 55 N.E. 1021 ; and (3) The entrapment-affirmative control of the instrument test —Pier v. Schultz (1962), 243 Ind. 200 , 182 N.E.2d 255 . | 6 | 1974–1990 |
Woodruff v. Bowen
green
2 sentences1990Harper cites three (3) tests which have been established to determine whether a defendant has breached such a duty: (1) The positive wrongful act test— Woodruff, Administratrix v. Bowen (1893), 136 Ind. 431 , 34 N.E. 1113 ; (2) The willful or wanton misconduct test — Lingenfelter v. Baltimore, Ry. 1990Harper cites three (3) tests which have been established to determine whether a defendant has breached such a duty: (1) The positive wrongful act test— Woodruff, Administratrix v. Bowen (1893), 136 Ind. 431 , 34 N.E. 1113 ; (2) The willful or wanton misconduct test — Lingenfelter v. Baltimore, Ry. | 6 | 1974–1990 |
Lingenfelter v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.
neutral
2 sentences1990Co. (1900), 154 Ind. 49 , 55 N.E. 1021 ; and (3) The entrapment-affirmative control of the instrument test —Pier v. Schultz (1962), 243 Ind. 200 , 182 N.E.2d 255 . 1990Co. (1900), 154 Ind. 49 , 55 N.E. 1021 ; and (3) The entrapment-affirmative control of the instrument test —Pier v. Schultz (1962), 243 Ind. 200 , 182 N.E.2d 255 . | 6 | 1974–1990 |
Fort Wayne National Bank v. Doctor
green
2 sentences1986In Fort Wayne Nat'l Bank v. Doctor (1971), 149 Ind. App. 365 , 272 N.E.2d 876 , trans. denied, Judge Buchanan distilled from prior case law three tests for determining whether that duty had been breached: (1) The positive wrongful act test, from Woodruff, Adm., supra text, 34 N.E. 1113 ; (2) The willful or wanton misconduct test, from Lingenfelter v. Baltimore, etc., Ry. 1986In Fort Wayne Nat'l Bank v. Doctor (1971), 149 Ind. App. 365 , 272 N.E.2d 876 , trans. denied, Judge Buchanan distilled from prior case law three tests for determining whether that duty had been breached: (1) The positive wrongful act test, from Woodruff, Adm., supra text, 34 N.E. 1113 ; (2) The willful or wanton misconduct test, from Lingenfelter v. Baltimore, etc., Ry. | 2 | 1979–1986 |
Koehn v. Devereaux
green
2 sentences1986The positive wrongful act test has been used in the three Indiana cases involving firemen: Woodruff, Adm., supra, 34 N.E. 1113 ; Koehn, supra text, 495 N.E.2d 211 ; and Pallikan, supra text, 322 N.E.2d 398 . 3 .Koop did not specifically claim that the Baileys were willful and wanton in allowing Baxle access to firearms until he filed his Motion to Correct Errors. 1986The positive wrongful act test has been used in the three Indiana cases involving firemen: Woodruff, Adm., supra, 34 N.E. 1113 ; Koehn, supra text, 495 N.E.2d 211 ; and Pallikan, supra text, 322 N.E.2d 398 . 3 .Koop did not specifically claim that the Baileys were willful and wanton in allowing Baxle access to firearms until he filed his Motion to Correct Errors. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Pallikan v. Mark
green
1 sentence1986The positive wrongful act test has been used in the three Indiana cases involving firemen: Woodruff, Adm., supra, 34 N.E. 1113 ; Koehn, supra text, 495 N.E.2d 211 ; and Pallikan, supra text, 322 N.E.2d 398 . 3 .Koop did not specifically claim that the Baileys were willful and wanton in allowing Baxle access to firearms until he filed his Motion to Correct Errors. | 1 | 1986–1986 |