Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ryle v. Stategreen2 sentences1994However, that case makes clear that "any confinement of the victim beyond that inherent in the force used to effectuate the robbery constitutes a violation of the confinement statute apart from the violation inherent in the offense of robbery." Id. at 84-85 (emphasis added). 1994However, any confinement of the victim beyond that inherent in the force used to effectuate the robbery constitutes a violation of the confinement statute apart from the violation inherent in the offense of robbery." Id. at 84-85 (citations and footnote omitted). | 3 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blockburger v. United States
green
2 sentences1994Bigler v. State (1992), Ind.App., 602 N.E.2d 509 , trans. denied; Blockburger v. United States (1932), 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 . 1994Bigler v. State (1992), Ind.App., 602 N.E.2d 509 , trans. denied; Blockburger v. United States (1932), 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Bigler v. State
green
1 sentence1994Bigler v. State (1992), Ind.App., 602 N.E.2d 509 , trans. denied; Blockburger v. United States (1932), 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Wethington v. State
green
2 sentences1992The law is well established that "[a]ny confinement of the victim beyond that inherent in the force used to effectuate the robbery constitutes a violation of the confinement statute apart from the violation inherent in the offense of robbery." Id. at 508 (citing Ryle v. State (1990), Ind. App., 549 N.E.2d 81, 84-85 ). 1992The law is well established that "(any confinement of the victim beyond that inherent in the force used to effectuate the robbery constitutes a violation of the confinement statute apart from the violation inherent in the offense of robbery." Id. at 508 (citing Ryle v. State (1990), Ind.App., 549 N.E.2d 81, 84-85 ). | 1 | 1992–1992 |