Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1876–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Huntleygreen1 sentence2021See 39 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ward
green
2 sentences2020State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 550 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011). 2020State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 550 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011). | 2 | 2014–2020 |
Wiles v. American Family Life Assurance Co.
green
2 sentences2019Wiles v. American Family Life Assurance Co., 302 Kan. 66 , 74, 350 P.3d 1071 (2015). 2019Wiles v. American Family Life Assurance Co., 302 Kan. 66 , 74, 350 P.3d 1071 (2015). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Bingham v. United States
green
1 sentence2014State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 550 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied 132 S. Ct. 1594 (2012). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Kansas Judicial Watch v. Stout
green
2 sentences2008The fact that we abandoned this state’s announce clause in 1984, see Kansas Judicial Watch, 440 F. Supp. 2d at 1228 , but continue to encourage judges’ participation in extra-judicial activities further supports the narrow interpretation of the commits clause that we adopt in this case. 2008The fact that we abandoned this state’s announce clause in 1984, see Kansas Judicial Watch, 440 F. Supp. 2d at 1228 , but continue to encourage judges’ participation in extra-judicial activities further supports the narrow interpretation of the commits clause that we adopt in this case. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
In Re Inquiry Relating to Baker
green
2 sentences2008That case, In re Baker, 218 Kan. 209, 211-12 , 542 P.2d 701 (1975), involved a challenge to the Commission’s finding that a district judge had violated the pledges clause by making statements during his campaign for judicial office that he would be a “ Tull time judge’ ” and that he would increase judicial efficiency. 2008That case, In re Baker, 218 Kan. 209, 211-12 , 542 P.2d 701 (1975), involved a challenge to the Commission’s finding that a district judge had violated the pledges clause by making statements during his campaign for judicial office that he would be a “ Tull time judge’ ” and that he would increase judicial efficiency. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Gillett v. Corum
neutral
1 sentence1876Gillett v. Corum, 7 Kas. 156 ; Kansas Ins. | 1 | 1876–1876 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.