Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 1947–1967 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Ledbettergreen1 sentence1967See Moore v. Ledbetter, Okl., 383 P.2d 876, 879 , Southwestern Bell Tel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Coats v. Duncan
green
2 sentences1961In the case of Squyres v. Klick, Okl., 264 P.2d 325, 326 , we said: “Before the court will reverse, a case for alleged errors in .instructions given it must clearly appear that the instructions complained of have caused a miscarriage of justice.” In the case of Coats v. Duncan, 202 Okl. 188 , 211 P.2d 269, 270 , we held: “The trial court commits no error in giving an instruction within the issues raised by the evidence in the case admitted without objection, although not within the issues raised by the original pleadings in the case, where the pleadings might have properly been amended at the 1961In the case of Squyres v. Klick, Okl., 264 P.2d 325, 326 , we said: “Before the court will reverse, a case for alleged errors in .instructions given it must clearly appear that the instructions complained of have caused a miscarriage of justice.” In the case of Coats v. Duncan, 202 Okl. 188 , 211 P.2d 269, 270 , we held: “The trial court commits no error in giving an instruction within the issues raised by the evidence in the case admitted without objection, although not within the issues raised by the original pleadings in the case, where the pleadings might have properly been amended at the | 2 | 1959–1961 |
Squyres v. Klick
neutral
1 sentence1961In the case of Squyres v. Klick, Okl., 264 P.2d 325, 326 , we said: “Before the court will reverse, a case for alleged errors in .instructions given it must clearly appear that the instructions complained of have caused a miscarriage of justice.” In the case of Coats v. Duncan, 202 Okl. 188 , 211 P.2d 269, 270 , we held: “The trial court commits no error in giving an instruction within the issues raised by the evidence in the case admitted without objection, although not within the issues raised by the original pleadings in the case, where the pleadings might have properly been amended at the | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Goldblatt Bros., Inc. v. Parish
green
2 sentences1959See Heckfuss v. American Packing Co., Mo. App., 224 S.W. 99 ; Finney v. Blalock, 208 Ga. 218 , 65 S.E.2d 920 ; Goldblatt Bros. v. Parrish, 110 Ind.App. 368 , 33 N.E.2d 835, 839 , 38 N.E.2d 255 ; Hill v. Elmore, 16 Ala.App. 474 , 79 So. 148 ; Sandy Valley & E. 1959See Heckfuss v. American Packing Co., Mo. App., 224 S.W. 99 ; Finney v. Blalock, 208 Ga. 218 , 65 S.E.2d 920 ; Goldblatt Bros. v. Parrish, 110 Ind.App. 368 , 33 N.E.2d 835, 839 , 38 N.E.2d 255 ; Hill v. Elmore, 16 Ala.App. 474 , 79 So. 148 ; Sandy Valley & E. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Finney v. Blalock
neutral
2 sentences1959See Heckfuss v. American Packing Co., Mo. App., 224 S.W. 99 ; Finney v. Blalock, 208 Ga. 218 , 65 S.E.2d 920 ; Goldblatt Bros. v. Parrish, 110 Ind.App. 368 , 33 N.E.2d 835, 839 , 38 N.E.2d 255 ; Hill v. Elmore, 16 Ala.App. 474 , 79 So. 148 ; Sandy Valley & E. 1959See Heckfuss v. American Packing Co., Mo. App., 224 S.W. 99 ; Finney v. Blalock, 208 Ga. 218 , 65 S.E.2d 920 ; Goldblatt Bros. v. Parrish, 110 Ind.App. 368 , 33 N.E.2d 835, 839 , 38 N.E.2d 255 ; Hill v. Elmore, 16 Ala.App. 474 , 79 So. 148 ; Sandy Valley & E. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Hill v. Elmore
neutral
2 sentences1959See Heckfuss v. American Packing Co., Mo. App., 224 S.W. 99 ; Finney v. Blalock, 208 Ga. 218 , 65 S.E.2d 920 ; Goldblatt Bros. v. Parrish, 110 Ind.App. 368 , 33 N.E.2d 835, 839 , 38 N.E.2d 255 ; Hill v. Elmore, 16 Ala.App. 474 , 79 So. 148 ; Sandy Valley & E. 1959See Heckfuss v. American Packing Co., Mo. App., 224 S.W. 99 ; Finney v. Blalock, 208 Ga. 218 , 65 S.E.2d 920 ; Goldblatt Bros. v. Parrish, 110 Ind.App. 368 , 33 N.E.2d 835, 839 , 38 N.E.2d 255 ; Hill v. Elmore, 16 Ala.App. 474 , 79 So. 148 ; Sandy Valley & E. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
McCullough v. Harshman
neutral
2 sentences1949McCullough v. Harshman, 99 Okla. 262 , 226 P. 555 ; Stumpf v. Montgomery, 101 Okla. 257 , 226 P. 65 ; De Camp v. Comerford, 134 Okla. 145 , 272 P. 475 ; Claxton v. Page, supra. Defendant Pollard contends that the evidence offered by him was sufficient to overcome the presumption relied upon, and that there was therefore no issue of fact to be submitted to the jury. 1949McCullough v. Harshman, 99 Okla. 262 , 226 P. 555 ; Stumpf v. Montgomery, 101 Okla. 257 , 226 P. 65 ; De Camp v. Comerford, 134 Okla. 145 , 272 P. 475 ; Claxton v. Page, supra. Defendant Pollard contends that the evidence offered by him was sufficient to overcome the presumption relied upon, and that there was therefore no issue of fact to be submitted to the jury. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Stumpf v. Montgomery
green
2 sentences1949McCullough v. Harshman, 99 Okla. 262 , 226 P. 555 ; Stumpf v. Montgomery, 101 Okla. 257 , 226 P. 65 ; De Camp v. Comerford, 134 Okla. 145 , 272 P. 475 ; Claxton v. Page, supra. Defendant Pollard contends that the evidence offered by him was sufficient to overcome the presumption relied upon, and that there was therefore no issue of fact to be submitted to the jury. 1949McCullough v. Harshman, 99 Okla. 262 , 226 P. 555 ; Stumpf v. Montgomery, 101 Okla. 257 , 226 P. 65 ; De Camp v. Comerford, 134 Okla. 145 , 272 P. 475 ; Claxton v. Page, supra. Defendant Pollard contends that the evidence offered by him was sufficient to overcome the presumption relied upon, and that there was therefore no issue of fact to be submitted to the jury. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
De Camp v. Comerford
neutral
2 sentences1949McCullough v. Harshman, 99 Okla. 262 , 226 P. 555 ; Stumpf v. Montgomery, 101 Okla. 257 , 226 P. 65 ; De Camp v. Comerford, 134 Okla. 145 , 272 P. 475 ; Claxton v. Page, supra. Defendant Pollard contends that the evidence offered by him was sufficient to overcome the presumption relied upon, and that there was therefore no issue of fact to be submitted to the jury. 1949McCullough v. Harshman, 99 Okla. 262 , 226 P. 555 ; Stumpf v. Montgomery, 101 Okla. 257 , 226 P. 65 ; De Camp v. Comerford, 134 Okla. 145 , 272 P. 475 ; Claxton v. Page, supra. Defendant Pollard contends that the evidence offered by him was sufficient to overcome the presumption relied upon, and that there was therefore no issue of fact to be submitted to the jury. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Bilby v. Gibson
green
2 sentences1947Bilby v. Gibson, 133 Okla. 196 , 271 P. 1026 ; Aetna life Ins. 1947Bilby v. Gibson, 133 Okla. 196 , 271 P. 1026 ; Aetna life Ins. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.