Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1916–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Milliken v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.green1 sentence1961See Milliken v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co., Ky., 341 S.W.2d 261 . | 1 | 1 |
King v. City of Pinevillegreen2 sentences1947See also King v. City of Pineville, 222 Ky. 73 , 299 S. W. 1082 . 1947See also King v. City of Pineville, 222 Ky. 73 , 299 S. W. 1082 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Polito v. Holland
green
2 sentences1994Because of the substantive consequence of the rule, evidence of collateral benefits is not generally material.” Polito v. Holland, 258 Ga. 54 , 365 S.E.2d 273 (1988). 1994Because of the substantive consequence of the rule, evidence of collateral benefits is not generally material.” Polito v. Holland, 258 Ga. 54 , 365 S.E.2d 273 (1988). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Commonwealth v. Burnett
green
2 sentences1947We there pointed out the distinction in the Smiddy case, and the cases where the consequence of a violation of the automobile law directed a forfeiture of driving license for certain infractions, and reaffirmed the Smiddy case in Com. v. Burnett, 274 Ky. 231, 233 , 118 S. W. 2d 558 . 1947We there pointed out the distinction in the Smiddy case, and the cases where the consequence of a violation of the automobile law directed a forfeiture of driving license for certain infractions, and reaffirmed the Smiddy case in Com. v. Burnett, 274 Ky. 231, 233 , 118 S. W. 2d 558 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Kentucky Coal & Timber Development Co. v. Carroll Hardwood Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1929Kentucky Coal & Timber Development Co. v. Carroll Hardwood Lumber Co., 154 Ky. 523 , 157 S. W. 1109 . 1929Kentucky Coal & Timber Development Co. v. Carroll Hardwood Lumber Co., 154 Ky. 523 , 157 S. W. 1109 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Sloane v. . Stevens
neutral
1 sentence1916In Sloan v. Stevens, 107 N. Y., 122 , another case quoted from by appellees ’ counsel, the doctrine announced in Allsop’s Appeal, supra, is approved; the opinion, as shown by the following excerpt, treating the will and codicil as separate instruments: “But while the word ‘will’ may, and often does cover codicils afterwards made and embrace the entire testamentary act, it nevertheless frequently and more naturally is descriptive of this part of the instrument as distinct from the other and different instrument designated as a codicil.” To the same effect are the other cases cited, and quoted b | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Hall v. Wright
green
1 sentence1916R. 851, 10 S. W. 793 ; Hall v. Wright, supra. The reason for giving the preference to the granting clause is said to lie in the fact that it is an indispensable part of the deed, while subsequent clauses ordinarily are not; and, insofar as the rule operates to prevent the abridgment of the estate conveyed by the granting-clause, it may also be said to be a consequence of the rule that, where the interpretation of the deed remains doubtful, a court will adopt the construction which is most favorable to the grantee. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.