Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1883–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Harrisgreen2 sentences1946“In State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 ( 52 N. W. 387, 388, 531 ), in holding that the’revocation of a.liquor license was not a punishment for the offense committed, the court said: ‘While the revocation by the court follows the conviction as a consequence of the violation of the ordinance, it has no more the purpose or effect of punishment than if the license were revoked by the mayor or city council, neither of whom would have the power to impose punishment for the offense. 1946“In State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 ( 52 N. W. 387, 388, 531 ), in holding that the’revocation of a.liquor license was not a punishment for the offense committed, the court said: ‘While the revocation by the court follows the conviction as a consequence of the violation of the ordinance, it has no more the purpose or effect of punishment than if the license were revoked by the mayor or city council, neither of whom would have the power to impose punishment for the offense. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Lown
green
2 sentences2025“The statutory 180-day rule, MCL 780.131 and MCL 780.133, may be invoked to require dismissal of a criminal case only if action is not commenced in the case within 180 days after the prosecutor 7 In his brief on appeal, defendant relies upon People v Bisard, 114, Mich App 784, 790; 319 NW2d 670 (1982), for the proposition that “[w]hen a delay is deliberately undertaken to prejudice a defendant, little actual prejudice need be shown to establish a due process claim.” However, defendant referred to no evidence indicating that delay was undertaken to prejudice his defense. -7- receives the requir 2025“The statutory 180-day rule, MCL 780.131 and MCL 780.133, may be invoked to require dismissal of a criminal case only if action is not commenced in the case within 180 days after the prosecutor 7 In his brief on appeal, defendant relies upon People v Bisard, 114, Mich App 784, 790; 319 NW2d 670 (1982), for the proposition that “[w]hen a delay is deliberately undertaken to prejudice a defendant, little actual prejudice need be shown to establish a due process claim.” However, defendant referred to no evidence indicating that delay was undertaken to prejudice his defense. -7- receives the requir | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Bisard
green
1 sentence2025“The statutory 180-day rule, MCL 780.131 and MCL 780.133, may be invoked to require dismissal of a criminal case only if action is not commenced in the case within 180 days after the prosecutor 7 In his brief on appeal, defendant relies upon People v Bisard, 114, Mich App 784, 790; 319 NW2d 670 (1982), for the proposition that “[w]hen a delay is deliberately undertaken to prejudice a defendant, little actual prejudice need be shown to establish a due process claim.” However, defendant referred to no evidence indicating that delay was undertaken to prejudice his defense. -7- receives the requir | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Clark
green
2 sentences2020The parties focus much of their arguments on MCL 28.424(4)(b)(iii), and whether petitioner successfully completed “all conditions of probation or parole imposed for the violation resulting in the prohibition.” Generally, a defendant in a criminal proceeding will be sentenced to either probation or a term of imprisonment, not both, with only a term of imprisonment carrying with it with a possibility of parole.8 Here, however, petitioner did receive both, albeit at different 8 In discussing the meaning of “parole” under Michigan law, this Court in People v Clark, 315 Mich App 219, 230 ; 888 NW2d 2020The parties focus much of their arguments on MCL 28.424(4)(b)(iii), and whether petitioner successfully completed “all conditions of probation or parole imposed for the violation resulting in the prohibition.” Generally, a defendant in a criminal proceeding will be sentenced to either probation or a term of imprisonment, not both, with only a term of imprisonment carrying with it with a possibility of parole.8 Here, however, petitioner did receive both, albeit at different 8 In discussing the meaning of “parole” under Michigan law, this Court in People v Clark, 315 Mich App 219, 230 ; 888 NW2d | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Department of Consumer & Industry Services v. Greenberg
green
1 sentence2013Although the language in the statute was mandatory, there was no language in the statute providing for a consequence for its violation: “The lack of [a] sanction leads us to believe that the time frames set out and relied on by appellant are primarily guidelines for the disciplinary system at issue here.” Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Massiah v. United States
green
2 sentences1985Brewer v Williams, supra; Massiah v United States, 377 US 201 ; 84 S Ct 1199 ; 12 L Ed 2d 246 (1964). 1985Brewer v Williams, supra; Massiah v United States, 377 US 201 ; 84 S Ct 1199 ; 12 L Ed 2d 246 (1964). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Brewer v. Williams
green
1 sentence1985Brewer v Williams, supra; Massiah v United States, 377 US 201 ; 84 S Ct 1199 ; 12 L Ed 2d 246 (1964). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Bell v. Morrison
green
1 sentence1941Bell v. Morrison, 1 Pet. (26 U. S.) 351, 362 ( 7 L. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Leavitt v. . Putnam
green
1 sentence1889Bills, 220; Story, Bills, § 220; Leavitt v. Putnam, 3 N. Y. 494 ; Baxter v. Little, 6 Metc. 7 ; and cases in note to page 275 of Big. | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Myers v. Prosser
neutral
1 sentence1883As a consequence of this error, the judgment which was taken in this case was reversed in this Court. 40 Mich. 644 . | 1 | 1883–1883 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.