Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ortizgreen1 sentence2017Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.3 provides, in pertinent part: If the petitioner is in custody after sentence for conviction for an offense, relief shall be granted only on the following grounds: (1) The conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution of the United States or the state of Louisiana!/] In State v. Ortiz, 11-2799, p. 7 (La. 1/29/13), 110 So.3d 1029, 1034, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 174 , 187 L.Ed.2d 42 (2013), the supreme court stated: Grounds for post-conviction relief in Louisiana are primarily restricted to constitutional or jurisdictional viol | 1 | 1 |
James Flowers v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Respondentgreen1 sentence1999The defendant cites Flowers v. Blackburn, 779 F.2d 1115, 1118 (5 th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1132 , 106 S.Ct. 1661 , 90 L.Ed.2d 204 (1986), but in that case the State did not raise the issue of the procedural bar. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2017Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.3 provides, in pertinent part: If the petitioner is in custody after sentence for conviction for an offense, relief shall be granted only on the following grounds: (1) The conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution of the United States or the state of Louisiana!/] In State v. Ortiz, 11-2799, p. 7 (La. 1/29/13), 110 So.3d 1029, 1034, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 174 , 187 L.Ed.2d 42 (2013), the supreme court stated: Grounds for post-conviction relief in Louisiana are primarily restricted to constitutional or jurisdictional viol 2017Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.3 provides, in pertinent part: If the petitioner is in custody after sentence for conviction for an offense, relief shall be granted only on the following grounds: (1) The conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution of the United States or the state of Louisiana!/] In State v. Ortiz, 11-2799, p. 7 (La. 1/29/13), 110 So.3d 1029, 1034, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 174 , 187 L.Ed.2d 42 (2013), the supreme court stated: Grounds for post-conviction relief in Louisiana are primarily restricted to constitutional or jurisdictional viol | 2 | 1997–2017 |
State v. Kendrick
neutral
1 sentence2017Likewise, this court has stated, “the ... assignment, involving prosecutorial mis conduct, should properly be raised in an application for post-conviction relief.” State v. Kendrick,, 96-1636, p. 18 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/25/97), 699 So.2d 424, 434 , writ denied, 98-2159 (La. 12/18/98), 731 So.2d 280 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Ortiz v. Louisiana
neutral
2 sentences2017Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.3 provides, in pertinent part: If the petitioner is in custody after sentence for conviction for an offense, relief shall be granted only on the following grounds: (1) The conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution of the United States or the state of Louisiana!/] In State v. Ortiz, 11-2799, p. 7 (La. 1/29/13), 110 So.3d 1029, 1034, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 174 , 187 L.Ed.2d 42 (2013), the supreme court stated: Grounds for post-conviction relief in Louisiana are primarily restricted to constitutional or jurisdictional viol 2017Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.3 provides, in pertinent part: If the petitioner is in custody after sentence for conviction for an offense, relief shall be granted only on the following grounds: (1) The conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution of the United States or the state of Louisiana!/] In State v. Ortiz, 11-2799, p. 7 (La. 1/29/13), 110 So.3d 1029, 1034, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 174 , 187 L.Ed.2d 42 (2013), the supreme court stated: Grounds for post-conviction relief in Louisiana are primarily restricted to constitutional or jurisdictional viol | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Kendrick
neutral
1 sentence2017Likewise, this court has stated, “the ... assignment, involving prosecutorial mis conduct, should properly be raised in an application for post-conviction relief.” State v. Kendrick,, 96-1636, p. 18 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/25/97), 699 So.2d 424, 434 , writ denied, 98-2159 (La. 12/18/98), 731 So.2d 280 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Smith v. Phillips
green
2 sentences2017Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.3 provides, in pertinent part: If the petitioner is in custody after sentence for conviction for an offense, relief shall be granted only on the following grounds: (1) The conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution of the United States or the state of Louisiana!/] In State v. Ortiz, 11-2799, p. 7 (La. 1/29/13), 110 So.3d 1029, 1034, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 174 , 187 L.Ed.2d 42 (2013), the supreme court stated: Grounds for post-conviction relief in Louisiana are primarily restricted to constitutional or jurisdictional viol 2017Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.3 provides, in pertinent part: If the petitioner is in custody after sentence for conviction for an offense, relief shall be granted only on the following grounds: (1) The conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution of the United States or the state of Louisiana!/] In State v. Ortiz, 11-2799, p. 7 (La. 1/29/13), 110 So.3d 1029, 1034, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 174 , 187 L.Ed.2d 42 (2013), the supreme court stated: Grounds for post-conviction relief in Louisiana are primarily restricted to constitutional or jurisdictional viol | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2014State v. Johnson, 406 So.2d 569 (La.1981); State v. Rhea, 04-0091 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/19/04) , 876 So.2d 131 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Rhea
green
1 sentence2014State v. Johnson, 406 So.2d 569 (La.1981); State v. Rhea, 04-0091 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/19/04) , 876 So.2d 131 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2007A complaint about the sentence received, as opposed to the fact of conviction, is not a proper ground for post-conviction relief under Article 930.8 and Melinie, supra. Furthermore, we note that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is analyzed under the two-prong test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 2007A complaint about the sentence received, as opposed to the fact of conviction, is not a proper ground for post-conviction relief under Article 930.8 and Melinie, supra. Furthermore, we note that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is analyzed under the two-prong test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State
green
1 sentence2007A complaint about the sentence received, as opposed to the fact of conviction, is not a proper ground for post-conviction relief under Article 930.8 and Melinie, supra. Furthermore, we note that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is analyzed under the two-prong test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Blackburn v. Flowers
green
2 sentences1999The defendant cites Flowers v. Blackburn, 779 F.2d 1115, 1118 (5 th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1132 , 106 S.Ct. 1661 , 90 L.Ed.2d 204 (1986), but in that case the State did not raise the issue of the procedural bar. 1999The defendant cites Flowers v. Blackburn, 779 F.2d 1115, 1118 (5 th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1132 , 106 S.Ct. 1661 , 90 L.Ed.2d 204 (1986), but in that case the State did not raise the issue of the procedural bar. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Perry v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente 1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Arcadia v. Ohio Power Co.
green
2 sentences1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente 1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Perry
green
1 sentence1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Ford v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences1992We note that this procedure satisfies the procedural due process requirements outlined in Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 , 106 S.Ct. 2595 , 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), namely: 1) Inclusion of the defendant in the truth seeking process; 2) The opportunity to cross examine in an adversarial setting; and 3) Inclusion of the judiciary in the decision making process (either in an active capacity or a reviewing capacity). 1992We note that this procedure satisfies the procedural due process requirements outlined in Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 , 106 S.Ct. 2595 , 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), namely: 1) Inclusion of the defendant in the truth seeking process; 2) The opportunity to cross examine in an adversarial setting; and 3) Inclusion of the judiciary in the decision making process (either in an active capacity or a reviewing capacity). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Perry
green
1 sentence1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Perry
neutral
1 sentence1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Perry v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente 1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Perry
green
1 sentence1992The trial court agreed and ruled accordingly. [2] State v. Perry, 502 So.2d 543 (La.1986). [3] Specifically, Perry was given Haldol to control the symptoms of his schizo-affective disorder. [4] State v. Perry, 543 So.2d 487 , reh'g denied, 545 So.2d 1049 (La.1989). [5] 494 U.S. 1015 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 492 (1990). [6] Perry v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 38 , 111 S.Ct. 449 , 112 L.Ed.2d 338 (1990) (per curiam), reh'g denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 804 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991). [7] 584 So.2d 1145 (La.1991). [8] La.Code Cr.Pro. art. 930.3 provides: If the petitioner is in custody after sente | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.