Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Romano v. Whitfieldgreen2 sentences2016See Romano v. Whitfield, 535 So.2d 12, 14 (La. 2016See Romano v. Whitfield, 535 So.2d 12, 14 (La. | 1 | 1 |
Tatum v. Village of Conversegreen2 sentences2014See Tatum, supra. Based on Tatum , we find that the trial court did not err in limiting the exhibits and witnesses to those presented at the Council hearing. 2014See Tatum, supra. Based on Tatum , we find that the trial court did not err in limiting the exhibits and witnesses to those presented at the Council hearing. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Smith
green
1 sentence2011State v. Smith, supra. The statute governs Ms. Council’s claim and the WCJ did not err in applying it to dismiss the claim. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
green
2 sentences1991A state or municipal law "must be upheld if it `regulates evenhandedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental.'" Edgar v. Mite Corp., 457 U.S. 624, 640 , 102 S.Ct. 2629, 2639 , 73 L.Ed.2d 269 (1982), citing Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 , 90 S.Ct. 844, 847 , 25 L.Ed.2d 174 (1970). 1991A state or municipal law "must be upheld if it `regulates evenhandedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental.'" Edgar v. Mite Corp., 457 U.S. 624, 640 , 102 S.Ct. 2629, 2639 , 73 L.Ed.2d 269 (1982), citing Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 , 90 S.Ct. 844, 847 , 25 L.Ed.2d 174 (1970). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Edgar v. Mite Corp.
green
2 sentences1991A state or municipal law "must be upheld if it `regulates evenhandedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental.'" Edgar v. Mite Corp., 457 U.S. 624, 640 , 102 S.Ct. 2629, 2639 , 73 L.Ed.2d 269 (1982), citing Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 , 90 S.Ct. 844, 847 , 25 L.Ed.2d 174 (1970). 1991A state or municipal law "must be upheld if it `regulates evenhandedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental.'" Edgar v. Mite Corp., 457 U.S. 624, 640 , 102 S.Ct. 2629, 2639 , 73 L.Ed.2d 269 (1982), citing Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 , 90 S.Ct. 844, 847 , 25 L.Ed.2d 174 (1970). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Housemaster Corp. v. City of Kenner
green
2 sentences1988After the conclusion of the trial, ABC for the first time raised in its brief the Council’s failure to give ABC proper notice of the Council hearing, citing Housemaster Corp. v. City of Kenner, 374 So.2d 1240 (La.1979). 1988After the conclusion of the trial, ABC for the first time raised in its brief the Council’s failure to give ABC proper notice of the Council hearing, citing Housemaster Corp. v. City of Kenner, 374 So.2d 1240 (La.1979). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge
green
2 sentences1988ACTION OF THE TRIAL COURT In his reasons for judgment the trial judge affirmed the action of the City Council on the following grounds: 1) The language of the ordinance applied to the renovation permit; 2) “Sidney’s” was not entitled to an exemption from the operation of the ordinance because Sidney’s was not in operation when the ordinance became effective in October, 1986; 3) The Council action was not palpably arbitrary and capricious and the Court should not substitute its judgment in the matter, relying upon the language of the Supreme Court found in Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City o 1988ACTION OF THE TRIAL COURT In his reasons for judgment the trial judge affirmed the action of the City Council on the following grounds: 1) The language of the ordinance applied to the renovation permit; 2) “Sidney’s” was not entitled to an exemption from the operation of the ordinance because Sidney’s was not in operation when the ordinance became effective in October, 1986; 3) The Council action was not palpably arbitrary and capricious and the Court should not substitute its judgment in the matter, relying upon the language of the Supreme Court found in Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City o | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.