Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1935–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Health Care Information Council v. Seton Health Plan, Inc.green2 sentences2004See id. 2004See id. | 2 | 2 |
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.green2 sentences1996In written correspondence to this Court, the Council has conceded that, in light of the fact that the trial court expressly granted the Council's motion on a specific ground, any argument that the judgment could be upheld on appeal on a different ground stated in the motion has been foreclosed by State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S., 858 S.W.2d 374, 380 (Tex.1993). 1996In written correspondence to this Court, the Council has conceded that, in light of the fact that the trial court expressly granted the Council's motion on a specific ground, any argument that the judgment could be upheld on appeal on a different ground stated in the motion has been foreclosed by State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S. , 858 S.W.2d 374, 380 (Tex. 1993). | 2 | 2 |
Hernandez v. Ebromgreen1 sentence2023See Hernandez, 289 S.W.3d at 321 ; Tricon Tool & Supply, 226 S.W.3d at 509 . | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Chamberlaingreen2 sentences2011Section 14071 . . . for each reportable conviction or adjudication under this chapter, if this state is to receive the maximum amount of federal money available to a state as described by that law. (b) After determining the minimum required registration period for each reportable conviction or adjudication under Subsection (a), the council shall compile and publish a list of reportable convictions or adjudications for which a person must register under this chapter for a period that exceeds the minimum required registration period under federal law. (c) To the extent possible, the council shal 2011Section 14071 . . . for each reportable conviction or adjudication under this chapter, if this state is to receive the maximum amount of federal money available to a state as described by that law. (b) After determining the minimum required registration period for each reportable conviction or adjudication under Subsection (a), the council shall compile and publish a list of reportable convictions or adjudications for which a person must register under this chapter for a period that exceeds the minimum required registration period under federal law. (c) To the extent possible, the council shal | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tricon Tool & Supply, Inc. v. Thumann
green
1 sentence2023See Hernandez, 289 S.W.3d at 321 ; Tricon Tool & Supply, 226 S.W.3d at 509 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Sanders v. Capitol Area Council, Boy Scouts of America
green
1 sentence2007Sanders , 930 S.W.2d at 911 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
S. M. Bernard Co. v. City of Los Angeles
neutral
2 sentences1935Bernard Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 18 Cal. App. 626 , 124 P. 88 , 93: “While the power of the council in hearing objections is thus limited, we do not consider the section as imposing like limitations upon it as to the time when it may render its decision upon the objections. 1935Bernard Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 18 Cal. App. 626 , 124 P. 88 , 93: “While the power of the council in hearing objections is thus limited, we do not consider the section as imposing like limitations upon it as to the time when it may render its decision upon the objections. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.