Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richard v. Hallgreen2 sentences2025Richard v. Hall, 03-1488 (La. 4/23/04), 874 So.2d 131, 151 . 2021See Richard v. Hall, 03-1488, p. 25-28 (La. 4/23/04), 874 So.2d 131, 149-51 (examining the legislative history in the creation of the recreational use immunity statutes and the interplay between La. | 1 | 2 |
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.green1 sentence1986Co., 393 So.2d 691 (La., 1981); Perniciaro v. Brinch, 384 So.2d 392 (La., 1980); Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498 (La., 1979), and then "only to the extent of lowering it (or raising it) to the highest (or lowest) point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded that court." Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So.2d 332 at 335 (La., 1976). [12] Except as to limiting the liability of Mead Reinsurance Corporation, the excess insurer of Hospital Service District No. 1 of the Parish of St. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alfred Oliver & Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist.
neutral
2 sentences1986(La.R.S. 56:312 & 56:352) Prior to the foregoing enactment the principle was recognized in Alfred Oliver & Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 169 La. 438 , 125 So. 441 (1929): Plaintiff had no proprietary interest in the fish it was prevented from catching, which were those found in the waters, under the jurisdiction of the state, not held by private ownership. 1986(La.R.S. 56:312 & 56:352) Prior to the foregoing enactment the principle was recognized in Alfred Oliver & Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 169 La. 438 , 125 So. 441 (1929): Plaintiff had no proprietary interest in the fish it was prevented from catching, which were those found in the waters, under the jurisdiction of the state, not held by private ownership. | 2 | 1974–1986 |
Breithaupt v. Sellers
green
2 sentences1986"F. The motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be granted on the issue of liability or on the issue of damages or on both issues." This is an amendment of the original enactment of this rule as LSA-C.C.P. art. 1810.1 which was modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 50(b), (c) and (d). [7] Robertson, supra, 472 So.2d at 929 . [8] Blum, supra, 469 So.2d at 1120 . [9] Courtney, 447 So.2d at 507 . [10] Breithaupt, supra, 390 So.2d at 874 . [11] A determination of the measure of damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless the trier of fact abused its much discret 1986"F. The motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be granted on the issue of liability or on the issue of damages or on both issues." This is an amendment of the original enactment of this rule as LSA-C.C.P. art. 1810.1 which was modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 50(b), (c) and (d). [7] Robertson, supra, 472 So.2d at 929 . [8] Blum, supra, 469 So.2d at 1120 . [9] Courtney, 447 So.2d at 507 . [10] Breithaupt, supra, 390 So.2d at 874 . [11] A determination of the measure of damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless the trier of fact abused its much discret | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Emerson v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1986Co., 393 So.2d 691 (La., 1981); Perniciaro v. Brinch, 384 So.2d 392 (La., 1980); Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498 (La., 1979), and then "only to the extent of lowering it (or raising it) to the highest (or lowest) point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded that court." Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So.2d 332 at 335 (La., 1976). [12] Except as to limiting the liability of Mead Reinsurance Corporation, the excess insurer of Hospital Service District No. 1 of the Parish of St. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Reck v. Stevens
green
1 sentence1986Co., 393 So.2d 691 (La., 1981); Perniciaro v. Brinch, 384 So.2d 392 (La., 1980); Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498 (La., 1979), and then "only to the extent of lowering it (or raising it) to the highest (or lowest) point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded that court." Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So.2d 332 at 335 (La., 1976). [12] Except as to limiting the liability of Mead Reinsurance Corporation, the excess insurer of Hospital Service District No. 1 of the Parish of St. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Robertson v. Penn
green
1 sentence1986"F. The motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be granted on the issue of liability or on the issue of damages or on both issues." This is an amendment of the original enactment of this rule as LSA-C.C.P. art. 1810.1 which was modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 50(b), (c) and (d). [7] Robertson, supra, 472 So.2d at 929 . [8] Blum, supra, 469 So.2d at 1120 . [9] Courtney, 447 So.2d at 507 . [10] Breithaupt, supra, 390 So.2d at 874 . [11] A determination of the measure of damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless the trier of fact abused its much discret | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Perniciaro v. Brinch
green
1 sentence1986Co., 393 So.2d 691 (La., 1981); Perniciaro v. Brinch, 384 So.2d 392 (La., 1980); Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498 (La., 1979), and then "only to the extent of lowering it (or raising it) to the highest (or lowest) point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded that court." Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So.2d 332 at 335 (La., 1976). [12] Except as to limiting the liability of Mead Reinsurance Corporation, the excess insurer of Hospital Service District No. 1 of the Parish of St. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Blum v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
green
1 sentence1986"F. The motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be granted on the issue of liability or on the issue of damages or on both issues." This is an amendment of the original enactment of this rule as LSA-C.C.P. art. 1810.1 which was modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 50(b), (c) and (d). [7] Robertson, supra, 472 So.2d at 929 . [8] Blum, supra, 469 So.2d at 1120 . [9] Courtney, 447 So.2d at 507 . [10] Breithaupt, supra, 390 So.2d at 874 . [11] A determination of the measure of damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless the trier of fact abused its much discret | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Courtney v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
green
1 sentence1986"F. The motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be granted on the issue of liability or on the issue of damages or on both issues." This is an amendment of the original enactment of this rule as LSA-C.C.P. art. 1810.1 which was modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 50(b), (c) and (d). [7] Robertson, supra, 472 So.2d at 929 . [8] Blum, supra, 469 So.2d at 1120 . [9] Courtney, 447 So.2d at 507 . [10] Breithaupt, supra, 390 So.2d at 874 . [11] A determination of the measure of damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless the trier of fact abused its much discret | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Colella v. State Racing Commission
green
2 sentences1980(No. 69) and Jockey’s Guild, Inc., - Pa. -, 422 A.2d 487 (1980), and Colella v. State Racing Commission, 360 Mass. 152 , 274 N.E.2d 331 (1971), the courts determined that the enactment of a rule designating jockey fees in the absence of contract was within the agencies’ general grant of authority. 1980(No. 69) and Jockey’s Guild, Inc., - Pa. -, 422 A.2d 487 (1980), and Colella v. State Racing Commission, 360 Mass. 152 , 274 N.E.2d 331 (1971), the courts determined that the enactment of a rule designating jockey fees in the absence of contract was within the agencies’ general grant of authority. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Gilligan v. Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission
green
1 sentence1980(No. 69) and Jockey’s Guild, Inc., - Pa. -, 422 A.2d 487 (1980), and Colella v. State Racing Commission, 360 Mass. 152 , 274 N.E.2d 331 (1971), the courts determined that the enactment of a rule designating jockey fees in the absence of contract was within the agencies’ general grant of authority. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Chicago Division of the Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Illinois Racing Board
green
2 sentences1980However, in Chicago, Div. of Horsemen's B. & P. Ass’n v. Illinois Racing Board, et al., 53 Ill.2d 16 , 289 N.E.2d 421 (1972), the court held that it was not. 1980However, in Chicago, Div. of Horsemen's B. & P. Ass’n v. Illinois Racing Board, et al., 53 Ill.2d 16 , 289 N.E.2d 421 (1972), the court held that it was not. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.