6 Louisiana opinions name it 3 courts 1981–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Confidential Partygreen1 sentence2016The majority fails to recognize the existence of directly relevant jurisprudence upholding the validity of certain ex delictu claims brought by a non-client against an attorney, which claims are not subject to the tripartite test set forth in Canal/Claiborne, Ltd., 156 So.3d at 633. | 1 | 1 |
Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.green2 sentences1993See First National Bank of Commerce v. Monco Agency Inc., 911 F.2d at 1058 ; MidAmerican Bank & Trust Co. v. Harrison, 851 S.W.2d at 564-5 ; Bily v. Arthur Young & Co., 3 Cal.4th 370 , 11 Cal. Rptr.2d 51 , 834 P.2d 745, 754 (Cal.1992). 1993See First National Bank of Commerce v. Monco Agency Inc., 911 F.2d at 1058 ; MidAmerican Bank & Trust Co. v. Harrison, 851 S.W.2d at 564-5 ; Bily v. Arthur Young & Co., 3 Cal.4th 370 , 11 Cal. Rptr.2d 51 , 834 P.2d 745, 754 (Cal.1992). | 1 | 1 |
First National Bank of Commerce (Formerly the Bank of New Orleans & Trust Company) v. Monco Agency Incorporated, Arthur Young & Companygreen1 sentence1993See First National Bank of Commerce v. Monco Agency Inc., 911 F.2d at 1058 ; MidAmerican Bank & Trust Co. v. Harrison, 851 S.W.2d at 564-5 ; Bily v. Arthur Young & Co., 3 Cal.4th 370 , 11 Cal. Rptr.2d 51 , 834 P.2d 745, 754 (Cal.1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Penalber v. Blount
green
1 sentence2016For example, in Succession of Killingsworth, 270 So.2d at 204-05 , which was cited with approval in Penalber, 550 So.2d at 578 n.2, the question was presented whether legatees under a will that had been declared invalid could state a cause of action against the attorney who drafted the will. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Succession of Killingsworth
green
1 sentence2016For example, in Succession of Killingsworth, 270 So.2d at 204-05 , which was cited with approval in Penalber, 550 So.2d at 578 n.2, the question was presented whether legatees under a will that had been declared invalid could state a cause of action against the attorney who drafted the will. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n
green
2 sentences2004In Perry Education Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn. , 460 U.S. 37 , 103 S.Ct. 948 , 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983), the Supreme Court announced a tripartite framework for determining how First Amendment interests are to be analyzed with respect to Government property. 2004In Perry Education Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn. , 460 U.S. 37 , 103 S.Ct. 948 , 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983), the Supreme Court announced a tripartite framework for determining how First Amendment interests are to be analyzed with respect to Government property. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
United States v. Michael Fosher
green
1 sentence2003United States v. Fosher, 568 F.2d 207 (1st Cir.1978). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
MidAmerican Bank & Trust Co. v. Harrison
green
1 sentence1993See First National Bank of Commerce v. Monco Agency Inc., 911 F.2d at 1058 ; MidAmerican Bank & Trust Co. v. Harrison, 851 S.W.2d at 564-5 ; Bily v. Arthur Young & Co., 3 Cal.4th 370 , 11 Cal. Rptr.2d 51 , 834 P.2d 745, 754 (Cal.1992). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
O'Brien v. Lanpar Company
green
2 sentences1992The landmark case in Texas applying the "minimum contacts" test is O'Brien v. Lanpar Company, 399 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1966), in which the Texas Supreme Court adopted a more explicit three part test than that which was enunciated in International Shoe, supra. The tripartite test requires a determination of (1) whether the defendant has engaged in a purposeful act or transaction within the state, (2) whether the cause of action resulted from the defendant's activity within the state, and (3) whether the assertion of jurisdiction comports with "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justic 1992O'Brien, supra, at 342 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
West v. Town of Winnsboro
green
1 sentence1981National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. v. Cefalu, 280 So.2d 903 (La.1973); West v. Winnsboro, 211 So.2d 665 (La.1968). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. v. Cefalu
green
1 sentence1981National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. v. Cefalu, 280 So.2d 903 (La.1973); West v. Winnsboro, 211 So.2d 665 (La.1968). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.