Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Massachusetts opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cuddyer v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.green2 sentences2004Defendant acknowledges that a plaintiff may rely on the continuing violation rule if she shows “within the six-month limitation the existence of at least one incident, which standing alone might not necessarily support her claim, but which substantially relates to earlier incidents of abuse, and substantially contributes to the continuation of a hostile work environment, such that the incident anchors all related incidents, thereby making the entirety of the claim for discriminatory conduct timely.” Cuddyer v. Stop and Shop Supermarkets, Inc., 434 Mass. 521, 533 (2001). 2002Cf. Cuddyer v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., 434 Mass. at 532-533 (plaintiff must show, within limitations period, “the existence of at least one incident of sexual conduct which, standing alone might not necessarily support her claim, but which substantially relates to earlier incidents of abuse, and substantially contributes to the continuation of a hostile work environment, such that the incident anchors all related incidents, thereby making the entirety of the claim for discriminatory conduct timely”). | 3 | 4 |
Pagliuca v. City of Bostongreen1 sentence2000Paglicuca v. City of Boston, 35 Mass.App.Ct. 820, 824 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
JOAN MORAN & another v. CAROLYN BENSON & others.
green
1 sentence2025This was the entirety of her claim, and the treatment within the seven-year period was not alleged to be separate acts of negligence . . . ." Id. at 747 .[6] Here, the judge concluded that for purposes of the repose period, the only "definitely established event" of negligence was the abnormal EKG in 2006. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.