Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Massachusetts opinions name it 1 courts 1923–1935 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kendall v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
green
1 sentence1935Kendall v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 171 Mass. 568, 573 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Commissioner of Banks v. Commonwealth-Atlantic National Bank
neutral
1 sentence1935On this point the case at bar falls within the authority of Commissioner of Banks v. Commonwealth-Atlantic National Bank, 248 Mass. 302, 306 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Watson v. Erickson
green
1 sentence1935On this point the case at bar is distinguishable from Watson v. Erickson, 276 Mass. 185, 187 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Anderson v. Home National Bank
green
1 sentence1935On this point the case at bar is governed by Anderson v. Home National Bank of Brockton, 290 Mass. 40, 44 , where it was said: "Whether a note is given and received in payment of an existing obligation or note, or is given and received in renewal or extension of an existing obligation or note, is a question of fact, in the absence of agreement of the parties to that end. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Uzzio's Case
neutral
1 sentence1933On this point the case at bar is governed by Uzzio’s Case, 228 Mass. 331 , Dow’s Case, 231 Mass. 348 , Fernald’s Case, 240 Mass. 567 , and Haskins’s Case, 261 Mass. 436 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Dow's Case
green
1 sentence1933On this point the case at bar is governed by Uzzio’s Case, 228 Mass. 331 , Dow’s Case, 231 Mass. 348 , Fernald’s Case, 240 Mass. 567 , and Haskins’s Case, 261 Mass. 436 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Fernald's Case
green
1 sentence1933On this point the case at bar is governed by Uzzio’s Case, 228 Mass. 331 , Dow’s Case, 231 Mass. 348 , Fernald’s Case, 240 Mass. 567 , and Haskins’s Case, 261 Mass. 436 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Haskins's Case
neutral
1 sentence1933On this point the case at bar is governed by Uzzio’s Case, 228 Mass. 331 , Dow’s Case, 231 Mass. 348 , Fernald’s Case, 240 Mass. 567 , and Haskins’s Case, 261 Mass. 436 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Clarke v. Rathbone
neutral
1 sentence1929There is nothing in Clarke v. Rathbone, 221 Mass. 574 , in conflict with what is here said. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Pratt v. Condon
neutral
1 sentence1929On this point the case at bar is to be distinguished from Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Dunn, 243 Mass. 7 , where there was an express provision as to survivorship, and from Pratt v. Condon, 239 Mass. 167 , and cases of similar import. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Dunn
green
1 sentence1929On this point the case at bar is to be distinguished from Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Dunn, 243 Mass. 7 , where there was an express provision as to survivorship, and from Pratt v. Condon, 239 Mass. 167 , and cases of similar import. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Commonwealth v. Hyland
neutral
1 sentence1923Commonwealth v. Hyland, 155 Mass. 7 . | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.