Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of Assessmentsgreen2 sentences2011Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of Assessments, 267 Md. 519, 523 , 298 A.2d 148, 150 (1973). 2011Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of Assessments, 267 Md. 519, 523 , 298 A.2d 148, 150 (1973). | 1 | 2 |
Hill v. Lockhartgreen2 sentences2016As the Supreme Court has noted, the assessment of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to discover exculpatory evidence in a case involving a guilty plea “will depend in large part on a prediction whether the evidence likely would have changed the outcome of a trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 , 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985). 2016As the Supreme Court has noted, the assessment of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to discover exculpatory evidence in a case involving a guilty plea “will depend in large part on a prediction whether the evidence likely would have changed the outcome of a trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See Jones v. State, 343 Md. 584, 605 , 683 A.2d 520 *164 (1996) (holding that it was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion to reseat jurors stricken in violation of Batson). 2004See Jones v. State, 343 Md. 584, 605 , 683 A.2d 520 *164 (1996) (holding that it was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion to reseat jurors stricken in violation of Batson). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frey v. Comptroller of the Treasury
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Northampton Corp. v. Prince George's County
green
2 sentences1998The district council relies on Northampton v. Prince George’s County, 273 Md. 93 , 327 A.2d 774 (1974), in support of its argument that written findings of fact and conclusions of law are not required when a special exception application is statutorily denied in Prince George’s County. 1998The district council relies on Northampton v. Prince George’s County, 273 Md. 93 , 327 A.2d 774 (1974), in support of its argument that written findings of fact and conclusions of law are not required when a special exception application is statutorily denied in Prince George’s County. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.