assessment waiver (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

assessment waiver in Oregon

10 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 1928–2025 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Thomasgreen
or · 1991 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012See State v. Thomas, 99 Or App 32, 35 , 780 P2d 1197 (1989), aff’d on other grounds, 311 Or 182 , 806 P2d 689 (1991) (“If theft III, as a violation, retains traits that characterize a criminal prosecution, then [the] defendant’s rights to a jury trial and to have her guilt proven beyond a reasonable doubt cannot be abrogated[.]”).

2012See State v. Thomas, 99 Or App 32, 35 , 780 P2d 1197 (1989), aff’d on other grounds, 311 Or 182 , 806 P2d 689 (1991) (“If theft III, as a violation, retains traits that characterize a criminal prosecution, then [the] defendant’s rights to a jury trial and to have her guilt proven beyond a reasonable doubt cannot be abrogated[.]”).

11
State v. Thomasgreen
orctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012See State v. Thomas, 99 Or App 32, 35 , 780 P2d 1197 (1989), aff’d on other grounds, 311 Or 182 , 806 P2d 689 (1991) (“If theft III, as a violation, retains traits that characterize a criminal prosecution, then [the] defendant’s rights to a jury trial and to have her guilt proven beyond a reasonable doubt cannot be abrogated[.]”).

2012See State v. Thomas, 99 Or App 32, 35 , 780 P2d 1197 (1989), aff’d on other grounds, 311 Or 182 , 806 P2d 689 (1991) (“If theft III, as a violation, retains traits that characterize a criminal prosecution, then [the] defendant’s rights to a jury trial and to have her guilt proven beyond a reasonable doubt cannot be abrogated[.]”).

11
Kentrox v. Dept. of Rev.green
ortc · 2007 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Citing ADC Kentrox v. Dept. of Rev., 19 OTR 340, 347-348 (2007), the Department concluded that “the stipulated agreement to reduce the value of the property for the 2008-09 tax DECISION TC-MD 110482D 1 year is not by itself a fact that indicates a likely error in the 2007-08 assessment.” (Id. at 24.) With respect to maximum assessed value, the Department concluded: “that the stipulated agreement for the 2008-09 tax year does not indicate a likely error in the calculation of MAV for 2007-08 because the parties did not agree as to the basis of the reduction.

11
Brown v. Sllvertongreen
or · 1920 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1928–1928
2 sentences

1928See, also, Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441 ( 190 Pac. 971 ).

1928See, also, Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441 ( 190 Pac. 971 ).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
KKMH Properties, LLC v. Shire green
orctapp · 2023
2 sentences

2025Therefore, the court continued, “[t]he requirement to give notice of an opportunity to cure is dependent on the landlord’s assessment whether the violation is one that * * * is reasonably capable of being cured within the prescribed time, i.e., within the minimum notice period that the landlord is required to give.” Id. at 7 .

2025Therefore, the court continued, “[t]he requirement to give notice of an opportunity to cure is dependent on the landlord’s assessment whether the violation is one that * * * is reasonably capable of being cured within the prescribed time, i.e., within the minimum notice period that the landlord is required to give.” Id. at 7 .

22025–2025
State v. Meyrick green
or · 1992
2 sentences

2023An assessment of whether a waiver is intentional and knowing “will depend on the particular circumstances of each case, including the defendant’s age, education, experience, and mental capacity; the charge (whether complicated or simple); the possible defenses available; and other relevant factors.” Id.

2023An assessment of whether a waiver is intentional and knowing “will depend on the particular circumstances of each case, including the defendant’s age, education, experience, and mental capacity; the charge (whether complicated or simple); the possible defenses available; and other relevant factors.” Id.

22023–2023
State v. Ward green
orctapp · 2019
2 sentences

2020It specifically noted that “a Miranda waiver may be tainted by a prior Miranda violation.” Id.

2020It recognized the factors that we identified in State v. Jarnagin, 351 Or 703 , 277 P3d 535 (2012), as being critical to the assessment of whether the waiver of the right to remain silent was “truly voluntary.” Ward, 295 Or App at 650 .

12020–2020
State v. Jarnagin green
or · 2012
2 sentences

2020It recognized the factors that we identified in State v. Jarnagin, 351 Or 703 , 277 P3d 535 (2012), as being critical to the assessment of whether the waiver of the right to remain silent was “truly voluntary.” Ward, 295 Or App at 650 .

2020It recognized the factors that we identified in State v. Jarnagin, 351 Or 703 , 277 P3d 535 (2012), as being critical to the assessment of whether the waiver of the right to remain silent was “truly voluntary.” Ward, 295 Or App at 650 .

12020–2020
Hess v. Seeger green
orctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1985Although at first blush the fees awarded appear high in relation to the amount of the judgment, an assessment of the factors utilized in determining appropriate fees, see Hess v. Seeger, 55 Or App 746 , 641 P2d 23 , rev den 293 Or 103 (1982); Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F2d 67 (9th Cir 1975), cert den 425 US 951 (1976), lead us to the conclusion that the trial court’s award was proper.

1985Although at first blush the fees awarded appear high in relation to the amount of the judgment, an assessment of the factors utilized in determining appropriate fees, see Hess v. Seeger, 55 Or App 746 , 641 P2d 23 , rev den 293 Or 103 (1982); Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F2d 67 (9th Cir 1975), cert den 425 US 951 (1976), lead us to the conclusion that the trial court’s award was proper.

11985–1985
Perkins v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc. green
scotus · 1976
1 sentence

1985Although at first blush the fees awarded appear high in relation to the amount of the judgment, an assessment of the factors utilized in determining appropriate fees, see Hess v. Seeger, 55 Or App 746 , 641 P2d 23 , rev den 293 Or 103 (1982); Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F2d 67 (9th Cir 1975), cert den 425 US 951 (1976), lead us to the conclusion that the trial court’s award was proper.

11985–1985
Francoeur v. State Accident Insurance Fund green
orctapp · 1974
2 sentences

1975We have treated medical expenses as “compensation.” See Francoeur v. SAIF, 17 Or App 37 , 520 P2d 477 , Sup Ct review denied (1974), where we left undisturbed the assessment by a hearing officer of penalties and attorney fees, but refused further penalties and fees.

1975We have treated medical expenses as “compensation.” See Francoeur v. SAIF, 17 Or App 37 , 520 P2d 477 , Sup Ct review denied (1974), where we left undisturbed the assessment by a hearing officer of penalties and attorney fees, but refused further penalties and fees.

11975–1975

Where else courts name it

PA 54 (1902–2024) IL 34 (1869–2025) IN 29 (1910–2020) MA 25 (1979–2025) WA 24 (1914–2026) CA 22 (1886–2026) NY 20 (1897–2026) TX 12 (1931–2025) MN 11 (1901–2016) NJ 11 (1952–2026) FL 10 (1939–2012) LA 10 (1976–2016) OR 10 (1928–2025) WI 10 (1895–2018) MD 7 (1986–2026) GA 6 (2010–2024) HI 6 (2007–2026) NM 5 (1930–2015) RI 5 (1996–2011) MO 5 (1918–2012) CO 5 (2001–2026) ME 4 (1998–2010) IA 4 (1912–1995) CT 4 (1989–2024) MI 4 (1958–2017) UT 4 (1911–2025) VA 3 (1999–2018) AZ 3 (1997–2017) OH 3 (1996–2025) NC 3 (2003–2014) DE 3 (1990–2025) KS 2 (2024–2026) KY 2 (1997–2017) ND 2 (1896–1973) AL 2 (1953–1966) AK 2 (2014–2014) WY 2 (1922–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check