equitable subrogation doctrine (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

equitable subrogation doctrine in Maryland

6 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1890–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Anderson v. Bursongreen
md · 2011 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Anderson, 424 Md. at 244 (declining to order a remand for new proceedings where the petitioner would not prevail on the facts in the record).17 17 Jones asserts that the circuit court erred in concluding that Wells Fargo became the secured party under the deed of trust through the doctrine of equitable subrogation.

11
Walker v. BD. OF COMM'RS AA CO.green
md · 1964 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013Id. at 25, 202 A.2d at 331.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Levenson green
md · 1995
2 sentences

2009Capital Mortgage Servs., Inc. v. Levenson, 338 Md. 227, 231-32 , 657 A.2d 1170 (1995) (quoting *266 G.E.

2009Capital Mortgage Servs., Inc. v. Levenson, 338 Md. 227, 231-32 , 657 A.2d 1170 (1995) (quoting *266 G.E.

12009–2009
Bachmann v. Glazer & Glazer, Inc. green
md · 1989
2 sentences

1994We turn next to whether the trial court erred in holding that G.E. was equitably subrogated to the rights contained in the First Federal deed of trust. ■ The Court of *131 Appeals reviewed the doctrine of equitable subrogation in Bachmann v. Glazer, 316 Md. 405, 412-13 , 559 A.2d 365 (1989).

1994We turn next to whether the trial court erred in holding that G.E. was equitably subrogated to the rights contained in the First Federal deed of trust. ■ The Court of *131 Appeals reviewed the doctrine of equitable subrogation in Bachmann v. Glazer, 316 Md. 405, 412-13 , 559 A.2d 365 (1989).

11994–1994
Allstate Insurance v. Reserve Insurance green
nh · 1976
1 sentence

1987Co., supra, 373 A.2d at 340 .

11987–1987
Keller v. Ashford green
scotus · 1890
1 sentence

1890Ashford, 133 U. S., 610 ; and the conclusion deduced is quite in accord with the New York decisions and the decision of this Court, as well as the decisions of many of the other State Courts of the country.

11890–1890

Where else courts name it

NY 55 (1880–2025) TX 45 (1978–2024) CA 43 (1935–2024) FL 27 (1974–2021) OH 20 (1990–2021) MI 19 (1993–2025) AZ 16 (1990–2020) IN 15 (2001–2024) GA 13 (1985–2025) AL 13 (1929–2016) WA 12 (1999–2025) NJ 12 (2000–2021) PA 11 (1920–2021) SC 11 (1993–2023) IL 11 (2001–2021) CT 9 (1986–2018) MN 9 (1977–2025) CO 8 (2005–2018) MO 7 (1984–2021) MA 6 (1999–2018) MD 6 (1890–2022) OK 6 (2000–2017) TN 5 (2008–2024) WI 5 (1997–2018) NV 5 (2012–2026) NC 5 (1994–2024) KY 4 (1960–2020) KS 4 (1919–2008) DC 3 (2011–2014) UT 3 (1993–2001) NE 3 (1943–1988) VA 3 (1997–2015) HI 2 (2001–2015) OR 2 (2004–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check