Hampton standard (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

Hampton standard in Michigan

6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Maxsongreen
mich · 2008 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024“Under the ‘purpose’ prong, a law may be applied retroactively when it concerns the ascertainment of guilt or innocence; however, a new rule of procedure which does not affect the integrity of the fact-finding process should be given prospective effect.” Maxson, 482 Mich at 393 (quotation marks, citations, and alteration omitted).

2024“Under the ‘purpose’ prong, a law may be applied retroactively when it concerns the ascertainment of guilt or innocence; however, a new rule of procedure which does not affect the integrity of the fact-finding process should be given prospective effect.” Maxson, 482 Mich at 393 (quotation marks, citations, and alteration omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Sexton green
mich · 1998
2 sentences

2024“Because the amount of past reliance will often have a profound effect on the administration of justice, the second and third factors are often dealt with together.” People v Sexton, 458 Mich 43, 63 ; 580 NW2d 404 (1998).

2024“Because the amount of past reliance will often have a profound effect on the administration of justice, the second and third factors are often dealt with together.” People v Sexton, 458 Mich 43, 63 ; 580 NW2d 404 (1998).

12024–2024
People v. Fyda green
michctapp · 2010
2 sentences

2018Further, a prosecutor “may also argue that the evidence was uncontradicted even if the defendant is the only person who could have contradicted the evidence.” Id.

2018Here, although the prosecutor stated that there was no evidence supporting Hampton’s defense and that the evidence supporting the charges was, essentially uncontradicted, we conclude that the arguments did not impermissibly shift the burden to Hampton to demonstrate his innocence. “[A] prosecutor’s argument that inculpatory evidence is undisputed does not constitute improper comment.” Id. at 464 .

12018–2018
People v. Wolfe green
mich · 1992
2 sentences

1993People v Wolfe, 440 Mich 508, 513-516 ; 489 NW2d 748 (1992). 11 Inherent in the task of considering the proofs in the light most favorable to the prosecution is the necessity to avoid a weighing of the proofs or a determination whether testimony favorable to the prosecution is to be believed.

1993People v Wolfe, 440 Mich 508, 513-516 ; 489 NW2d 748 (1992). 11 Inherent in the task of considering the proofs in the light most favorable to the prosecution is the necessity to avoid a weighing of the proofs or a determination whether testimony favorable to the prosecution is to be believed.

11993–1993
People v. Hearn green
michctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1989The question of whether the evidence was suffi cient to show a larcenous intent contemporaneous with the commission of the sexual attack is answered by the similar case of People v Hearn, 159 Mich App 275, 278-282 ; 406 NW2d 211 (1987).

1989The question of whether the evidence was suffi cient to show a larcenous intent contemporaneous with the commission of the sexual attack is answered by the similar case of People v Hearn, 159 Mich App 275, 278-282 ; 406 NW2d 211 (1987).

11989–1989
People v. Montague neutral
mich · 1888
2 sentences

1986While it is true that knowledge of the fact that the parts are stolen is an essential element of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property, People v Montague, 71 Mich 318 ; 39 NW 60 (1888), a rational trier of fact under the Hampton standard could clearly find that, when defendant went to the alley with the other individuals and they all descended on the car "like a pit crew,” as stated by the officer who observed the event, defendant had the requisite guilty knowledge.

1986While it is true that knowledge of the fact that the parts are stolen is an essential element of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property, People v Montague, 71 Mich 318 ; 39 NW 60 (1888), a rational trier of fact under the Hampton standard could clearly find that, when defendant went to the alley with the other individuals and they all descended on the car "like a pit crew,” as stated by the officer who observed the event, defendant had the requisite guilty knowledge.

11986–1986
People v. Garcia green
mich · 1976
2 sentences

1981The Court stated: "In summary, the trial judge when ruling on a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal must consider the evidence presented by the prosecution up to the time the motion is made, Garcia, supra, view that evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, People v Vail, 393 Mich 460, 463 ; 227 NW2d 535 (1975), and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Jackson, supra, p 319.” Because the trial occurred before the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hampton, we apply the test announc

1981The Court stated: "In summary, the trial judge when ruling on a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal must consider the evidence presented by the prosecution up to the time the motion is made, Garcia, supra, view that evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, People v Vail, 393 Mich 460, 463 ; 227 NW2d 535 (1975), and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Jackson, supra, p 319.” Because the trial occurred before the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hampton, we apply the test announc

11981–1981
People v. Vail red
mich · 1975
2 sentences

1981The Court stated: "In summary, the trial judge when ruling on a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal must consider the evidence presented by the prosecution up to the time the motion is made, Garcia, supra, view that evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, People v Vail, 393 Mich 460, 463 ; 227 NW2d 535 (1975), and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Jackson, supra, p 319.” Because the trial occurred before the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hampton, we apply the test announc

1981The Court stated: "In summary, the trial judge when ruling on a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal must consider the evidence presented by the prosecution up to the time the motion is made, Garcia, supra, view that evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, People v Vail, 393 Mich 460, 463 ; 227 NW2d 535 (1975), and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Jackson, supra, p 319.” Because the trial occurred before the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hampton, we apply the test announc

11981–1981

Where else courts name it

NJ 16 (1994–2025) OR 7 (1995–2019) GA 7 (1983–2025) MO 6 (2008–2023) MI 6 (1981–2024) CA 5 (1993–2023) FL 4 (1999–2014) WA 4 (2016–2026) IN 4 (2007–2020) WI 3 (2004–2018) MS 3 (2007–2024) CO 3 (1972–1992) NY 3 (1987–2015) LA 3 (1993–2015) OK 2 (2024–2024) IL 2 (2012–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check