Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Golbagreen2 sentences2023The language of the catchall provision requires that three conditions be satisfied before “a person must register as a sex offender: (1) the defendant must have been convicted of a state-law violation or a municipal-ordinance violation, (2) the violation must, by its nature, constitute a sexual offense, and (3) the victim of the violation must be under 18 years of age.” Golba, 273 Mich App at 607 (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2017For the catchall provision to apply, “(1) the defendant must have been convicted of a state-law violation or a municipal-ordinance violation, (2) the violation must, ‘by its nature,’ constitute a ‘sexual offense,’ and (3) the victim of the violation must be under 18 years of age.” Golba, 273 Mich App at 607 , quoting People v Meyers, 250 Mich App 637, 647 ; 649 NW2d 123 (2002), overruled on other grounds by People v Lee, 489 Mich 289 . | 1 | 4 |
People v. Andersongreen1 sentence2026In other words, three conditions must exist to order registration under the catchall provision: “(1) the defendant must have been convicted of a state-law violation or a municipal- ordinance violation, (2) the violation must, by its nature, constitute a sexual offense, and (3) the victim of the violation must be under 18 years of age.” Anderson, 284 Mich App at 14 (cleaned up). | 1 | 1 |
Shelton v. Tuckergreen2 sentences1973NAACP v Alabama, 357 US 449 ; 78 S Ct 1163 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1488 (1958); Shelton v Tucker, supra, 485; 81 S Ct at 251 ; 5 L Ed 2d at 236 ; Schneider v Smith, supra; and United States v Robel, supra. That freedom may not be denied to an individual or unreasonably limited merely because he has chosen public employment as a police officer. 1973NAACP v Alabama, 357 US 449 ; 78 S Ct 1163 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1488 (1958); Shelton v Tucker, supra, 485; 81 S Ct at 251 ; 5 L Ed 2d at 236 ; Schneider v Smith, supra; and United States v Robel, supra. That freedom may not be denied to an individual or unreasonably limited merely because he has chosen public employment as a police officer. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Meyers
green
2 sentences2017For the catchall provision to apply, “(1) the defendant must have been convicted of a state-law violation or a municipal-ordinance violation, (2) the violation must, ‘by its nature,’ constitute a ‘sexual offense,’ and (3) the victim of the violation must be under 18 years of age.” Golba, 273 Mich App at 607 , quoting People v Meyers, 250 Mich App 637, 647 ; 649 NW2d 123 (2002), overruled on other grounds by People v Lee, 489 Mich 289 . 2017For the catchall provision to apply, “(1) the defendant must have been convicted of a state-law violation or a municipal-ordinance violation, (2) the violation must, ‘by its nature,’ constitute a ‘sexual offense,’ and (3) the victim of the violation must be under 18 years of age.” Golba, 273 Mich App at 607 , quoting People v Meyers, 250 Mich App 637, 647 ; 649 NW2d 123 (2002), overruled on other grounds by People v Lee, 489 Mich 289 . | 3 | 2007–2017 |
People v. Lee
green
2 sentences2017For the catchall provision to apply, “(1) the defendant must have been convicted of a state-law violation or a municipal-ordinance violation, (2) the violation must, ‘by its nature,’ constitute a ‘sexual offense,’ and (3) the victim of the violation must be under 18 years of age.” Golba, 273 Mich App at 607 , quoting People v Meyers, 250 Mich App 637, 647 ; 649 NW2d 123 (2002), overruled on other grounds by People v Lee, 489 Mich 289 . 2017For the catchall provision to apply, “(1) the defendant must have been convicted of a state-law violation or a municipal-ordinance violation, (2) the violation must, ‘by its nature,’ constitute a ‘sexual offense,’ and (3) the victim of the violation must be under 18 years of age.” Golba, 273 Mich App at 607 , quoting People v Meyers, 250 Mich App 637, 647 ; 649 NW2d 123 (2002), overruled on other grounds by People v Lee, 489 Mich 289 . | 2 | 2017–2017 |
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. Patterson
green
2 sentences1973NAACP v Alabama, 357 US 449 ; 78 S Ct 1163 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1488 (1958); Shelton v Tucker, supra, 485; 81 S Ct at 251 ; 5 L Ed 2d at 236 ; Schneider v Smith, supra; and United States v Robel, supra. That freedom may not be denied to an individual or unreasonably limited merely because he has chosen public employment as a police officer. 1973NAACP v Alabama, 357 US 449 ; 78 S Ct 1163 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1488 (1958); Shelton v Tucker, supra, 485; 81 S Ct at 251 ; 5 L Ed 2d at 236 ; Schneider v Smith, supra; and United States v Robel, supra. That freedom may not be denied to an individual or unreasonably limited merely because he has chosen public employment as a police officer. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Schneider v. Smith
green
1 sentence1973NAACP v Alabama, 357 US 449 ; 78 S Ct 1163 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1488 (1958); Shelton v Tucker, supra, 485; 81 S Ct at 251 ; 5 L Ed 2d at 236 ; Schneider v Smith, supra; and United States v Robel, supra. That freedom may not be denied to an individual or unreasonably limited merely because he has chosen public employment as a police officer. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
United States v. Robel
green
1 sentence1973NAACP v Alabama, 357 US 449 ; 78 S Ct 1163 ; 2 L Ed 2d 1488 (1958); Shelton v Tucker, supra, 485; 81 S Ct at 251 ; 5 L Ed 2d at 236 ; Schneider v Smith, supra; and United States v Robel, supra. That freedom may not be denied to an individual or unreasonably limited merely because he has chosen public employment as a police officer. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.