6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Duncan v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Duncan v Michigan, 284 Mich App 246 ; 774 NW2d 89 (2009) (concerning the right to counsel); Hinojosa v Dep’t of Natural Resources, 263 Mich App 537 ; 688 NW2d 550 (2004) (concerning an unconstitutional taking of property); Jones, supra (concerning tort claims arising from an entry into a home without a warrant). 2010See Duncan v Michigan, 284 Mich App 246 ; 774 NW2d 89 (2009) (concerning the right to counsel); Hinojosa v Dep’t of Natural Resources, 263 Mich App 537 ; 688 NW2d 550 (2004) (concerning an unconstitutional taking of property); Jones, supra (concerning tort claims arising from an entry into a home without a warrant). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gonzales
green
2 sentences2021In People v Gonzales, 193 Mich App 263, 265 ; 483 NW2d 458 (1992) (quotation marks and citation omitted), a case that involved a witness who made an unsolicited outburst that alerted the jury to inadmissible evidence of a prior conviction, this Court articulated the standard for determining when a mistrial is appropriate: It is well settled that the grant or denial of a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and there must be a showing of prejudice to the defendant’s rights if error requiring reversal is claimed. 2021In People v Gonzales, 193 Mich App 263, 265 ; 483 NW2d 458 (1992) (quotation marks and citation omitted), a case that involved a witness who made an unsolicited outburst that alerted the jury to inadmissible evidence of a prior conviction, this Court articulated the standard for determining when a mistrial is appropriate: It is well settled that the grant or denial of a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and there must be a showing of prejudice to the defendant’s rights if error requiring reversal is claimed. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Jones v. Powell
green
1 sentence2010See Duncan v Michigan, 284 Mich App 246 ; 774 NW2d 89 (2009) (concerning the right to counsel); Hinojosa v Dep’t of Natural Resources, 263 Mich App 537 ; 688 NW2d 550 (2004) (concerning an unconstitutional taking of property); Jones, supra (concerning tort claims arising from an entry into a home without a warrant). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Hinojosa v. Department of Natural Resources
green
2 sentences2010See Duncan v Michigan, 284 Mich App 246 ; 774 NW2d 89 (2009) (concerning the right to counsel); Hinojosa v Dep’t of Natural Resources, 263 Mich App 537 ; 688 NW2d 550 (2004) (concerning an unconstitutional taking of property); Jones, supra (concerning tort claims arising from an entry into a home without a warrant). 2010See Duncan v Michigan, 284 Mich App 246 ; 774 NW2d 89 (2009) (concerning the right to counsel); Hinojosa v Dep’t of Natural Resources, 263 Mich App 537 ; 688 NW2d 550 (2004) (concerning an unconstitutional taking of property); Jones, supra (concerning tort claims arising from an entry into a home without a warrant). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Boyd v. W G Wade Shows
green
2 sentences2004Boyd v. W G Wade Shows, 443 Mich. 515, 523 , 505 N.W.2d 544 (1993). 2004Boyd v. W G Wade Shows, 443 Mich. 515, 523 , 505 N.W.2d 544 (1993). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Holly
green
2 sentences1992The trial court’s ruling must be "so grossly in error as to deprive a defendant of a fair trial or to amount to a miscarriage of justice.” People v Holly, 129 Mich App 405, 415 ; 341 NW2d 823 (1983). 1992The trial court’s ruling must be "so grossly in error as to deprive a defendant of a fair trial or to amount to a miscarriage of justice.” People v Holly, 129 Mich App 405, 415 ; 341 NW2d 823 (1983). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Wright
neutral
2 sentences1979People v Wright, 78 Mich App 246 ; 259 NW2d 443 (1977). 1979People v Wright, 78 Mich App 246 ; 259 NW2d 443 (1977). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Bovine v. Selden
neutral
2 sentences1917Bovine v. Selden, 155 Mich. 556 ( 119 N. W. 1090 , 130 Am. 1917Bovine v. Selden, 155 Mich. 556 ( 119 N. W. 1090 , 130 Am. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.