6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reyes-Camarenagreen2 sentences2020See State v. Reyes-Camarena, 330 Or 431, 436 , 7 P3d 522 (2000) (holding that the alleged error was not plain, in part, because “[n]o Oregon appellate court ha[d] considered the issue, let alone held that defendant’s position [was] cor- rect”). 2020See State v. Reyes-Camarena, 330 Or 431, 436 , 7 P3d 522 (2000) (holding that the alleged error was not plain, in part, because “[n]o Oregon appellate court ha[d] considered the issue, let alone held that defendant’s position [was] cor- rect”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008As the Supreme Court stated in Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 335 Or 164, 173 , 61 P3d 928 (2003), “an error ‘affecting’ a party’s rights is an error that can be said to ‘produce a material influence’ or ‘to have a detrimental influence’ on those rights, and not merely one that ‘might’ have changed the outcome of the case. 2008As the Supreme Court stated in Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 335 Or 164, 173 , 61 P3d 928 (2003), “an error ‘affecting’ a party’s rights is an error that can be said to ‘produce a material influence’ or ‘to have a detrimental influence’ on those rights, and not merely one that ‘might’ have changed the outcome of the case. | 3 | 2008–2023 |
Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences2013We attempt to discern the meaning of the statute under the rules of PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993), as modified by State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009). 2013We attempt to discern the meaning of the statute under the rules of PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993), as modified by State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Gaines
green
2 sentences2013We attempt to discern the meaning of the statute under the rules of PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993), as modified by State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009). 2013We attempt to discern the meaning of the statute under the rules of PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993), as modified by State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Capital Investments, Inc. v. Lofgren
green
2 sentences1986In Capital Investments v. Lofgren, 81 Or App 93, 96 , 724 P2d 862 (1986), we explained: “Under the doctrine of res judicata, a judgment on the merits is a final and conclusive determination of the parties’ rights and a bar to a subsequent proceeding between them on the same cause of action as to all matters which were or could have been litigated. 1986In Capital Investments v. Lofgren, 81 Or App 93, 96 , 724 P2d 862 (1986), we explained: “Under the doctrine of res judicata, a judgment on the merits is a final and conclusive determination of the parties’ rights and a bar to a subsequent proceeding between them on the same cause of action as to all matters which were or could have been litigated. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.