6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1941–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & Ebersoldgreen1 sentence1986Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & Ebersold, 356 N.W.2d 333, 337 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co.green2 sentences1984Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 151, 153 (1964); Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co., 221 Minn. 474, 479 , 22 N.W.2d 545, 548 (1946). 1984Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 151, 153 (1964); Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co., 221 Minn. 474, 479 , 22 N.W.2d 545, 548 (1946). | 1 | 1 |
Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co.green2 sentences1984Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 151, 153 (1964); Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co., 221 Minn. 474, 479 , 22 N.W.2d 545, 548 (1946). 1984Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 122, 125 , 128 N.W.2d 151, 153 (1964); Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co., 221 Minn. 474, 479 , 22 N.W.2d 545, 548 (1946). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sampair v. Village of Birchwood
green
1 sentence2024Sampair, 784 N.W.2d at 73 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Palubicki
green
2 sentences2007Id. 2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Lunning v. Land O'Lakes
green
1 sentence1985In order to invoke equitable estoppel, the party invoking the doctrine must have acted upon the misrepresentation or omission “in such a way as to change [her] position for the worse.” Lun-ning, 303 N.W.2d at 457 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. McAllister
neutral
2 sentences1941The court said: “For a foreign corporation, then, to be a nonresident of the state, or out of the state, in the sense of the statute, it must be out of the state in such sense as to render it impracticable at all times to obtain service of process upon it.” In accord is Title G. & S. Co. v. McAllister, 130 Ohio St. 537, 546 , 200 N. E. 831, 835 , where it was considered “a fair proposition” that “the test of the running of the statute should be the liability of the party invoking its bar to the service of process during the whole of the period prescribed.” For this case, we *162 repeat, under 1941The court said: “For a foreign corporation, then, to be a nonresident of the state, or out of the state, in the sense of the statute, it must be out of the state in such sense as to render it impracticable at all times to obtain service of process upon it.” In accord is Title G. & S. Co. v. McAllister, 130 Ohio St. 537, 546 , 200 N. E. 831, 835 , where it was considered “a fair proposition” that “the test of the running of the statute should be the liability of the party invoking its bar to the service of process during the whole of the period prescribed.” For this case, we *162 repeat, under | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.