Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1880–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2013Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United States, 89 Fed.Cl. 480, 503 (2009) (citing Evergreen Trading, LLC v. United States, 80 Fed.Cl. 122, 127 (2007)). | 1 | 1 |
Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2013Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United States, 89 Fed.Cl. 480, 503 (2009) (citing Evergreen Trading, LLC v. United States, 80 Fed.Cl. 122, 127 (2007)). | 1 | 1 |
Mazer v. Jackson Ins. Agencygreen1 sentence2011Agency, 340 So.2d 770, 773 (Ala.1976) (quoting 3 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence § 805 (5th ed.1941), for the requirement that the party invoking the doctrine of estoppel must demonstrate that “the truth concerning [the] facts [in issue] must be unknown to the ... party claiming the benefit of the estoppel”). | 1 | 1 |
Kilgore v. Stategreen1 sentence2007See Kilgore , 643 So.2d at 1018 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peterson v. City of Abbeville
green
1 sentence2011Furthermore, as the main opinion notes, the doctrine of estoppel is applied against a municipality only “1 “when justice and fair play demand it.” ’ ” 77 So.3d at 1172 (quoting Peterson, 1 So.3d at 44 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Sturgis
neutral
2 sentences1981Co. v. Murphree , 129 Ala. 432 , 29 So. 592 ; Central of Georgia R. v. Sturgis , 149 Ala. 573 , 43 So. 96 "It would seem that the statute requiring a driver's license imposes a duty for the benefit of the public at large and the individual defendant therefore, would acquire no new rights by virtue of its enactment, nor would a violation thereof by the plaintiff, although a criminal offense, inure to the benefit of the defendant so as to be pleaded as contributory negligence against the plaintiff in an action for damages arising from an auto collision between them "Moreover, there was no eviden 1981Co. v. Murphree , 129 Ala. 432 , 29 So. 592 ; Central of Georgia R. v. Sturgis , 149 Ala. 573 , 43 So. 96 "It would seem that the statute requiring a driver's license imposes a duty for the benefit of the public at large and the individual defendant therefore, would acquire no new rights by virtue of its enactment, nor would a violation thereof by the plaintiff, although a criminal offense, inure to the benefit of the defendant so as to be pleaded as contributory negligence against the plaintiff in an action for damages arising from an auto collision between them "Moreover, there was no eviden | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Murphree
neutral
1 sentence1981Co. v. Murphree , 129 Ala. 432 , 29 So. 592 ; Central of Georgia R. v. Sturgis , 149 Ala. 573 , 43 So. 96 "It would seem that the statute requiring a driver's license imposes a duty for the benefit of the public at large and the individual defendant therefore, would acquire no new rights by virtue of its enactment, nor would a violation thereof by the plaintiff, although a criminal offense, inure to the benefit of the defendant so as to be pleaded as contributory negligence against the plaintiff in an action for damages arising from an auto collision between them "Moreover, there was no eviden | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Express Company v. Ware
neutral
1 sentence1880If there is the continuous liability, the residence or domicile of the party is immaterial.—Express Co . v. Ware, 20 Wall. 543 . | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.