7 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1991–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Babcock v. Bridgeport Hospitalgreen2 sentences2001Babcock v. Bridgeport Hospital , 251 Conn. 790 , 847-48 (1999). 2001Kowalonek v. Bryant Lane, Inc. , Superior Court, judicial district of Danbury, Docket No. 324942 (April 11, 2000, Moraghan, J. ); see also Babcock v. Bridgeport Hospital , 251 Conn. 790 , 848 , 742 A.2d 322 (1999) ("[w]here the status of a document cannot be discerned from the face of a discovery request . . . the party opposed to discovery has the burden of both asserting and establishing the applicable privilege."); State v. Hanna , 150 Conn. 457 , 466 , 191 A.2d 124 (1963) ("[t]he burden of proving the facts essential to the [attorney-client] privilege is on the person asserting it."). | 1 | 2 |
Jacobs v. Fazzanogreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., Jacobs v. Fazzano, 59 Conn. App. 716, 730 , 757 A.2d 1215 (2000) (one of the fundamental principles upon which equity jurisprudence is founded is that he who seeks equity must come to court with clean hands). 2010See, e.g., Jacobs v. Fazzano, 59 Conn. App. 716, 730 , 757 A.2d 1215 (2000) (one of the fundamental principles upon which equity jurisprudence is founded is that he who seeks equity must come to court with clean hands). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Woodsgreen2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Woods, 250 Conn. 807 , 813 n.5, 740 A.2d 371 (1999). 2003See, e.g., State v. Woods, 250 Conn. 807 , 813 n.5, 740 A.2d 371 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hannagreen2 sentences2001Kowalonek v. Bryant Lane, Inc. , Superior Court, judicial district of Danbury, Docket No. 324942 (April 11, 2000, Moraghan, J. ); see also Babcock v. Bridgeport Hospital , 251 Conn. 790 , 848 , 742 A.2d 322 (1999) ("[w]here the status of a document cannot be discerned from the face of a discovery request . . . the party opposed to discovery has the burden of both asserting and establishing the applicable privilege."); State v. Hanna , 150 Conn. 457 , 466 , 191 A.2d 124 (1963) ("[t]he burden of proving the facts essential to the [attorney-client] privilege is on the person asserting it."). 2001Kowalonek v. Bryant Lane, Inc. , Superior Court, judicial district of Danbury, Docket No. 324942 (April 11, 2000, Moraghan, J. ); see also Babcock v. Bridgeport Hospital , 251 Conn. 790 , 848 , 742 A.2d 322 (1999) ("[w]here the status of a document cannot be discerned from the face of a discovery request . . . the party opposed to discovery has the burden of both asserting and establishing the applicable privilege."); State v. Hanna , 150 Conn. 457 , 466 , 191 A.2d 124 (1963) ("[t]he burden of proving the facts essential to the [attorney-client] privilege is on the person asserting it."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McElveen
green
2 sentences2017Accordingly, the litigant must establish these consequences by more than mere conjecture, but need not demonstrate that these conse- quences are more probable than not.’’ State v. McElveen, 261 Conn. 198, 208 , 802 A.2d 74 (2002). 2017Accordingly, the litigant must establish these consequences by more than mere conjecture, but need not demonstrate that these conse- quences are more probable than not.’’ State v. McElveen, 261 Conn. 198, 208 , 802 A.2d 74 (2002). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Williams v. Ragaglia
green
2 sentences2017The collateral consequences doctrine requires the party invoking the doctrine ‘‘to demonstrate more than an abstract, purely speculative injury . . . .’’ Williams v. Ragaglia, 261 Conn. 219, 227 , 802 A.2d 778 (2002). ‘‘[F]or a litigant to invoke successfully the collateral consequences doctrine, the litigant must show that there is a reasonable possibility that prejudicial collat- eral consequences will occur. 2017The collateral consequences doctrine requires the party invoking the doctrine ‘‘to demonstrate more than an abstract, purely speculative injury . . . .’’ Williams v. Ragaglia, 261 Conn. 219, 227 , 802 A.2d 778 (2002). ‘‘[F]or a litigant to invoke successfully the collateral consequences doctrine, the litigant must show that there is a reasonable possibility that prejudicial collat- eral consequences will occur. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Zoning Commission v. Lescynski
green
2 sentences1991A party invoking the claim of estoppel against a government agency must prove the following: 1) that the agency did or said something calculated to induce the party to believe that certain facts exist and to act on that belief 2) that the party has changed his position in reliance on those facts, thereby incurring a loss Zoning Commission v. Sescynski, 188 Conn. 724 , 731 , 453 A.2d 1144 (1982); 3) that the government agent inducing the detrimental reliance had authority to do so 4) that special circumstances CT Page 2176 exist which make it highly inequitable or oppressive to enforce the appl 1991A party invoking the claim of estoppel against a government agency must prove the following: 1) that the agency did or said something calculated to induce the party to believe that certain facts exist and to act on that belief 2) that the party has changed his position in reliance on those facts, thereby incurring a loss Zoning Commission v. Sescynski, 188 Conn. 724 , 731 , 453 A.2d 1144 (1982); 3) that the government agent inducing the detrimental reliance had authority to do so 4) that special circumstances CT Page 2176 exist which make it highly inequitable or oppressive to enforce the appl | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Town of West Hartford v. Rechel
green
2 sentences1991West Hartford v. Rechel, 190 Conn. 114 , 121 459 A.2d 1015 (1983); 5) that he exercised due diligence in ascertaining the legality of his conduct; and 6) that he not only lacked knowledge of the true state of things, but also had no convenient means of acquiring that knowledge. 1991West Hartford v. Rechel, 190 Conn. 114 , 121 459 A.2d 1015 (1983); 5) that he exercised due diligence in ascertaining the legality of his conduct; and 6) that he not only lacked knowledge of the true state of things, but also had no convenient means of acquiring that knowledge. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.