Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Frey v. Yustgreen2 sentences1998The court in Frey v. Yust, 516 S.W.2d 321, 323 (Mo.App.1974), explains: An option is a privilege, a right of election to exercise a privilege. 1997The court *673 in Frey v. Yust, 516 S.W.2d 321, 323 (Mo.App.1974), explains: An option is a privilege, a right of election to exercise a privilege. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Troupegreen1 sentence2019See Troupe, 891 S.W.2d at 811 (‘This Court will not adopt a rule that permits a defendant to benefit from his own misconduct.”); Smith, 887 S.W.2d at 602 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stein v. Reising
green
2 sentences1965Construing the agreement as a whole and the option clause, lessees “shall have the option of purchasing said premises,” in its context (Stein v. Reising, 359 Mo. 804 , 224 S.W.2d 80 ) there can be no doubt that an absolute and unconditional option was granted. 1965Construing the agreement as a whole and the option clause, lessees “shall have the option of purchasing said premises,” in its context (Stein v. Reising, 359 Mo. 804 , 224 S.W.2d 80 ) there can be no doubt that an absolute and unconditional option was granted. | 2 | 1954–1965 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence2019See Troupe, 891 S.W.2d at 811 (‘This Court will not adopt a rule that permits a defendant to benefit from his own misconduct.”); Smith, 887 S.W.2d at 602 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Lusco v. Tavitian
green
1 sentence1965In Lusco v. Tavitian, Mo., 296 S.W.2d 14 , the problem was whether there had been a proper and timely acceptance but it was assumed by everyone that the language “the lessor does hereby grant to lessee an option to purchase” at a specified time on specified terms was an absolute and unconditional option entitling the optionee to specific performance. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Arnot v. Alexander
green
1 sentence1962In Arnot et al. v. Alexander, 44 Mo. 25 , also cited by plaintiff, the amount of rent to be charged and paid in event of the exercise of an option to renew, was “as much as any other responsible party will agree to pay.” It was held in that case that the contract provided for third parties to determine the rent to be charged upon renewal, to which determination both parties agreed to be bound. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Insurance & Law Building Co. v. National Bank
green
1 sentence1962Plaintiff cites Insurance and Law Building Co. v. National Bank of Missouri, 71 Mo. 58 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Snowden v. Dawdy
green
1 sentence1962In Snowden v. Dawdy, Mo.App., 343 S.W.2d 197 , the option clause made no mention of any change in terms or conditions in event of exercise, and thus the written lease constituted the entire agreement between the parties. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.