Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Russell v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence2004Section 302.312, RSMo 2000; Russell v. Director of Revenue, 35 S.W.3d 507, 509 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Mills v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence2001See also, Mills, 964 S.W.2d at 875-876 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Calhoongreen1 sentence2001In State v. Calhoon, 7 S.W.3d 494, 495 (Mo.App.W.D.1999), the Court held that unlike the general business records exception statute, section 302.312 does not impose a service requirement on the admissibility of exhibits. | 1 | 1 |
Coleman v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence1999Dugan v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, 979 S.W.2d 563, 564 (Mo.App.1998); State v. Anders, 975 S.W.2d 462, 465 (Mo.App.1998); Coleman v. Director of Revenue, 970 S.W.2d 394, 396 (Mo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Dugan v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence1999Dugan v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, 979 S.W.2d 563, 564 (Mo.App.1998); State v. Anders, 975 S.W.2d 462, 465 (Mo.App.1998); Coleman v. Director of Revenue, 970 S.W.2d 394, 396 (Mo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Andersgreen1 sentence1999Dugan v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, 979 S.W.2d 563, 564 (Mo.App.1998); State v. Anders, 975 S.W.2d 462, 465 (Mo.App.1998); Coleman v. Director of Revenue, 970 S.W.2d 394, 396 (Mo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Ostermueller v. Pottergreen1 sentence1995See Ostermueller v. Potter, 868 S.W.2d 110, 111 (Mo. banc 1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ellis McSwain, Appointing Authority and The Board of Probation and Parole, Missouri Department of Corrections v. Cletus Andrew Morton
green
1 sentence2015We have continued to recognize, however, that “conduct that constitutes cause can be of such a serious nature that it readily satisfies the good of the service requirement.” McSwain v. Morton, 452 S.W.3d 199 , 210 n.8 (Mo.App.W.D.2014). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Crouch v. Crouch
green
1 sentence1984In discussing this decision in Crouch , the supreme court stated, 641 S.W.2d at 94 : In Bengiminia a default judgment was rendered against the defendant who, like appellant in the present case, failed to appear. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.