Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Marshburngreen1 sentence2026State v. Marshburn, 109 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Cavenaugh v. Cavenaughgreen2 sentences2017However, "[s]pecific performance will not be decreed against a defendant who is incapable of complying with his contract." Cavenaugh , 317 N.C. at 657 , 347 S.E.2d at 22-23 (citations omitted). 2017However, "[s]pecific performance will not be decreed against a defendant who is incapable of complying with his contract." Cavenaugh , 317 N.C. at 657 , 347 S.E.2d at 22-23 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2014Ed. 2d 430 , 443 (2001) (hereinafter “Cromartie 17”) (quoting Miller, 515 U.S. at 916 , 115 S. Ct. at 2488 , 132 L. 2014Ed. 2d 430 , 443 (2001) (hereinafter “Cromartie 17”) (quoting Miller, 515 U.S. at 916 , 115 S. Ct. at 2488 , 132 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hensley v. Ray's Motor Co. of Forest City, Inc.
green
1 sentence2025MCLAWHORN Opinion of the Court considers factors including the contract’s “language,” the material’s “intrinsic worth,” and “the nature of the [supplier’s] business.” Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Whalehead Properties v. Coastland Corp.
green
2 sentences2017In determining whether standard money damages will constitute an adequate remedy at law, the trial court considers factors which include the "difficulty and uncertainty of collecting such damages after they are awarded[.]" Whalehead Properties v. Coastland Corp. , 299 N.C. 270 , 283, 261 S.E.2d 899 , 908 (1980) (citation omitted). 2017In determining whether standard money damages will constitute an adequate remedy at law, the trial court considers factors which include the "difficulty and uncertainty of collecting such damages after they are awarded[.]" Whalehead Properties v. Coastland Corp. , 299 N.C. 270 , 283, 261 S.E.2d 899 , 908 (1980) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Dewberry
green
2 sentences2015Id. at 182 , 600 S.E.2d at 869 -70 . 2015Id. at 182 , 600 S.E.2d at 869 -70 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Hunt, Governor of North Carolina v. Cromartie
green
2 sentences2014As a court considers which standard of review is appropriate, it should be mindful of the Supreme Court’s observation that “courts must ‘exercise extraordinary caution in adjudicating claims that a State has drawn district lines on the basis of race.’ ” Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 , 242, 121 S. Ct. 1452 , 1458, 149 L. 2014As a court considers which standard of review is appropriate, it should be mindful of the Supreme Court’s observation that “courts must ‘exercise extraordinary caution in adjudicating claims that a State has drawn district lines on the basis of race.’ ” Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 , 242, 121 S. Ct. 1452 , 1458, 149 L. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
green
2 sentences2003Id. 2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.