defendant to prove defense (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

defendant to prove defense in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1896–1985 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Caldwell green
· 1977
2 sentences

1985State v. Caldwell, 293 N.C. 336 , 237 S.E. 2d 742 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1075 , 55 L.Ed. 2d 780 , 98 S.Ct. 1264 (1978).

1985State v. Caldwell, 293 N.C. 336 , 237 S.E. 2d 742 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1075 , 55 L.Ed. 2d 780 , 98 S.Ct. 1264 (1978).

21979–1985
Johnson v. United States green
scotus · 1978
2 sentences

1985State v. Caldwell, 293 N.C. 336 , 237 S.E. 2d 742 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1075 , 55 L.Ed. 2d 780 , 98 S.Ct. 1264 (1978).

1979State v. Caldwell, 293 N.C. 336 , 237 S.E. 2d 742 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1075 , 55 L.Ed. 2d 780 , 98 S.Ct. 1264 (1978).

21979–1985
Loden v. Thompson green
scotus · 1978
2 sentences

1985State v. Caldwell, 293 N.C. 336 , 237 S.E. 2d 742 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1075 , 55 L.Ed. 2d 780 , 98 S.Ct. 1264 (1978).

1979State v. Caldwell, 293 N.C. 336 , 237 S.E. 2d 742 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1075 , 55 L.Ed. 2d 780 , 98 S.Ct. 1264 (1978).

21979–1985
State v. . Williams neutral
nc · 1925
2 sentences

1940And the charge that if the jury found that these defendants were so drunk that they did not know or realize what they were doing, they would not be guilty of murder in the first degree but would be guilty of murder in the second degree has been approved in effect by this Court in the case of S. v. Williams , 189 N.C. 616 -620.

1940And the charge that if the jury found that these defendants were so drunk that they did not know or realize what they were doing, they would not be guilty of murder in the first degree but would be guilty of murder in the second degree has been approved in effect by this Court in the case of S. v. Williams, 189 N. C., 616 -620.

21940–1940
Wharton v. New York Life Insurance neutral
nc · 1919
2 sentences

1948Co., 178 N. C. 135 , 100 S. E. 266 ; Hedgecock v. Insurance Co., supra; MacClure v. Casualty Co., ante, p. 305.

1948Co., 178 N. C. 135 , 100 S. E. 266 ; Hedgecock v. Insurance Co., supra; MacClure v. Casualty Co., ante, p. 305.

11948–1948
State v. . Bryson green
· 1879
1 sentence

1896It devolved upon the defendant to prove in defense, not merely a belief that he had a bona fide right to enter, but he “ was. bound to prove that he had reasonable ground for such belief.” State v. Bryson, 81 N. C., 595 ; State v. Crawley, 103 N. C., 353 .

11896–1896
State v. . Crawley neutral
nc · 1889
1 sentence

1896It devolved upon the defendant to prove in defense, not merely a belief that he had a bona fide right to enter, but he “ was. bound to prove that he had reasonable ground for such belief.” State v. Bryson, 81 N. C., 595 ; State v. Crawley, 103 N. C., 353 .

11896–1896

Where else courts name it

PA 29 (1941–2025) TX 21 (1924–2017) WA 14 (1967–2021) TN 13 (1999–2026) CA 12 (1946–2021) LA 12 (1986–2014) GA 8 (1922–2001) IL 7 (1940–2025) NE 6 (1897–2016) NC 6 (1896–1985) CT 5 (1996–2018) MD 5 (1981–2005) IN 5 (1915–2005) MO 4 (1953–2023) FL 4 (1980–2019) MS 4 (2002–2014) NY 4 (1915–1999) OK 4 (1897–1964) OR 3 (1922–2001) AZ 3 (1971–2018) OH 3 (1962–1999) WV 3 (1941–1990) MN 3 (1981–2009) IA 3 (1891–1957) ND 3 (1896–2022) ID 3 (1988–1999) HI 2 (2001–2020) MA 2 (2011–2026) KS 2 (1972–2013) MI 2 (2023–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check