Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carney v. Roberts Inv. Co., Inc.green2 sentences2015A factual sufficiency challenge should be sustained, “…only if the evidence that supports the jury finding is so weak as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust.” McDonald, 212 S.W.3d at 339 , citing Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986); See also, Carney, 837 S.W.2d at 208 (“A reversal is required if this court concludes that the verdict is so against the great weight and preponderance of evidence as to be manifestly unjust.”) Under Texas law, “ ‘[t]he standards and tests for determining contributory negligence ordinarily are the same as those for determining negligence,’ and when c 2015A factual sufficiency challenge should be sustained, “…only if the evidence that supports the jury finding is so weak as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust.” McDonald, 212 S.W.3d at 339 , citing Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986); See also, Carney, 837 S.W.2d at 208 (“A reversal is required if this court concludes that the verdict is so against the great weight and preponderance of evidence as to be manifestly unjust.”) Under Texas law, “ ‘[t]he standards and tests for determining contributory negligence ordinarily are the same as those for determining negligence,’ and when c | 4 | 5 |
Rylander v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Rylander v. State , 101 S.W.3d 107 , 109 B 10 (Tex. Crim. 2004See Rylander v. State, 101 S.W.3d 107, 110 (Tex.Crim.App.2003); Bone v. State, 77 S.W.3d 828, 833 (Tex.Crim.App.2002). | 3 | 3 |
Hill v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Id.; Reyes v. State , 752 S.W.2d 591, 592 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (citing Hill v. State , 719 S.W.2d 199, 201 (Tex. Crim. 2003Id.; Reyes v. State, 752 S.W.2d 591, 592 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (citing Hill v. State, 719 S.W.2d 199, 201 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)). | 2 | 2 |
Reyes v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Id.; Reyes v. State , 752 S.W.2d 591, 592 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (citing Hill v. State , 719 S.W.2d 199, 201 (Tex. Crim. 2003Id.; Reyes v. State, 752 S.W.2d 591, 592 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (citing Hill v. State, 719 S.W.2d 199, 201 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)). | 2 | 2 |
McDonald v. Dankworthgreen2 sentences2017McDonald v. Dankworth, 212 S.W.3d 336, 340 (Tex. App.Austin 2006, no pet.). 2015A factual sufficiency challenge should be sustained, “…only if the evidence that supports the jury finding is so weak as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust.” McDonald, 212 S.W.3d at 339 , citing Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986); See also, Carney, 837 S.W.2d at 208 (“A reversal is required if this court concludes that the verdict is so against the great weight and preponderance of evidence as to be manifestly unjust.”) Under Texas law, “ ‘[t]he standards and tests for determining contributory negligence ordinarily are the same as those for determining negligence,’ and when c | 1 | 2 |
Jordan v. City of Lubbockgreen1 sentence2015Further, “…contributory negligence is not established by evidence which is equally consistent with the exercise of the care by the plaintiff, or where the inference of due care is just as reasonable as is the inference of the absence thereof.” Jordan v. City of Lubbock, 88 S.W.2d 560, 563 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1935, writ dism’d), citing Salter v. Galveston, H. & S.A. | 1 | 1 |
Cain v. Baingreen1 sentence2015A factual sufficiency challenge should be sustained, “…only if the evidence that supports the jury finding is so weak as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust.” McDonald, 212 S.W.3d at 339 , citing Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986); See also, Carney, 837 S.W.2d at 208 (“A reversal is required if this court concludes that the verdict is so against the great weight and preponderance of evidence as to be manifestly unjust.”) Under Texas law, “ ‘[t]he standards and tests for determining contributory negligence ordinarily are the same as those for determining negligence,’ and when c | 1 | 1 |
Meraz v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 8.01 (West 2011); Meraz v. State, 785 S.W.2d 146, 150 (Tex. Crim. 2012See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 8.01 (West 2011); Meraz v. State, 785 S.W.2d 146, 150 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Dallas County Constable Precinct 5 Michael D. Dupree v. KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd.green1 sentence2012Dupree v. KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd., 219 S.W.3d 602, 607 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Bone v. Stategreen1 sentence2004See Rylander v. State, 101 S.W.3d 107, 110 (Tex.Crim.App.2003); Bone v. State, 77 S.W.3d 828, 833 (Tex.Crim.App.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence1934See Garcia v. State, 275 S. W., 1005 ; Hathcock v. State, 281 S. W., 859 ; Tucker v. State, 281 S. W., 869 ; Ford v. State, 285 S. W., 614 ; Thompson v. State, 288 S. W., 464 ; and Shannon v. State, 30 S. W. (2d) 331 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Agurs
green
2 sentences2007Id. at 404 n.7. 2007Id. at 404 n.7. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Marshall v. State
green
1 sentence2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Saxton v. State
green
1 sentence1995Saxton v. State, 804 S.W.2d 910 , 912 n. 5 (Tex.Crim. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1992Strickland, 466 U.S. at 696 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069 . 1992Strickland, 466 U.S. at 696 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Taber
neutral
1 sentence1992Quintanilla v. Estate of Tuma, 579 S.W.2d 531 (Tex.Civ.App. — San Antonio 1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Taber, 221 S.W.2d 339 (Tex.Civ.App. — Galveston 1949, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Fort Worth & D.C. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Quintanilla v. Estate of Tuma
neutral
1 sentence1992Quintanilla v. Estate of Tuma, 579 S.W.2d 531 (Tex.Civ.App. — San Antonio 1979, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Taber, 221 S.W.2d 339 (Tex.Civ.App. — Galveston 1949, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Fort Worth & D.C. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Thompson v. State
neutral
1 sentence1934See Garcia v. State, 275 S. W., 1005 ; Hathcock v. State, 281 S. W., 859 ; Tucker v. State, 281 S. W., 869 ; Ford v. State, 285 S. W., 614 ; Thompson v. State, 288 S. W., 464 ; and Shannon v. State, 30 S. W. (2d) 331 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Ford v. State
neutral
1 sentence1934See Garcia v. State, 275 S. W., 1005 ; Hathcock v. State, 281 S. W., 859 ; Tucker v. State, 281 S. W., 869 ; Ford v. State, 285 S. W., 614 ; Thompson v. State, 288 S. W., 464 ; and Shannon v. State, 30 S. W. (2d) 331 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Shannon v. State
yellow
1 sentence1934See Garcia v. State, 275 S. W., 1005 ; Hathcock v. State, 281 S. W., 859 ; Tucker v. State, 281 S. W., 869 ; Ford v. State, 285 S. W., 614 ; Thompson v. State, 288 S. W., 464 ; and Shannon v. State, 30 S. W. (2d) 331 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Tucker v. State
neutral
1 sentence1934See Garcia v. State, 275 S. W., 1005 ; Hathcock v. State, 281 S. W., 859 ; Tucker v. State, 281 S. W., 869 ; Ford v. State, 285 S. W., 614 ; Thompson v. State, 288 S. W., 464 ; and Shannon v. State, 30 S. W. (2d) 331 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Hathcock v. State
neutral
1 sentence1934See Garcia v. State, 275 S. W., 1005 ; Hathcock v. State, 281 S. W., 859 ; Tucker v. State, 281 S. W., 869 ; Ford v. State, 285 S. W., 614 ; Thompson v. State, 288 S. W., 464 ; and Shannon v. State, 30 S. W. (2d) 331 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
H. T.C.R.R. Co. v. Anglin
green
1 sentence1924Railway Co. v. Anglin, 99 Tex. 349 , 89 S. W. 966 , 2 L. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Gulf, C. Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brown Williamson
neutral
1 sentence1924Railway Co. v. Anglin, 99 Tex. 349 , 89 S. W. 966 , 2 L. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.