Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stout v. Stoutgreen2 sentences2019See Stout v. Stout, 1997 ND 61, ¶ 33 , 560 N.W.2d 903 (outlining the factors applying to consideration of an out-of-state move); Hawkinson v. Hawkinson, 1999 ND 58, ¶ 9 , 591 N.W.2d 144 (modifying the factors applying to consideration of out-of- state moves). 2019See Stout v. Stout, 1997 ND 61, ¶ 33 , 560 N.W.2d 903 (outlining the factors applying to consideration of an out-of-state move); Hawkinson v. Hawkinson, 1999 ND 58, ¶ 9 , 591 N.W.2d 144 (modifying the factors applying to consideration of out-of- state moves). | 2 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hawkinson v. Hawkinson
green
2 sentences2019See Stout v. Stout, 1997 ND 61, ¶ 33 , 560 N.W.2d 903 (outlining the factors applying to consideration of an out-of-state move); Hawkinson v. Hawkinson, 1999 ND 58, ¶ 9 , 591 N.W.2d 144 (modifying the factors applying to consideration of out-of- state moves). 2019See Stout v. Stout, 1997 ND 61, ¶ 33 , 560 N.W.2d 903 (outlining the factors applying to consideration of an out-of-state move); Hawkinson v. Hawkinson, 1999 ND 58, ¶ 9 , 591 N.W.2d 144 (modifying the factors applying to consideration of out-of- state moves). | 4 | 2009–2019 |
Porter v. Porter
green
2 sentences2007Porter, 2006 ND 123, ¶ 6 , 714 N.W.2d 865 . *837 [¶ 9] In this case, the district court made findings on the four Stout-Hawkinson factors. 2007Porter, 2006 ND 123, ¶ 6 , 714 N.W.2d 865 . *837 [¶ 9] In this case, the district court made findings on the four Stout-Hawkinson factors. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Dvorak v. Dvorak
green
2 sentences2007Dvorak, 2006 ND 171, ¶ 14 , 719 N.W.2d 362 . [¶ 14] The district court applied the four Stout-Hawkinson factors and found the move to Arizona was not in the children’s best interests. 2007Dvorak, 2006 ND 171, ¶ 14 , 719 N.W.2d 362 . [¶ 14] The district court applied the four Stout-Hawkinson factors and found the move to Arizona was not in the children’s best interests. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.