Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1914–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Estate of Wagnergreen2 sentences1996Cf.Matter of Estate of Wagner , 551 N.W.2d 292, 296 (N.D. 1996) (testamentary capacity requires testator to have sufficient strength and clearness of mind to know the nature and extent of property, the nature of act to be performed, the names and identities of persons who are the objects of bounty, and to appreciate the relation of those factors and recollect the decision). 1996Cf. Matter of Estate of Wagner, 551 N.W.2d 292, 296 (N.D.1996) (testamentary capacity requires testator to have sufficient strength and clearness of mind to know the nature and extent of property, the nature of act to be performed, the names and identities of persons who are the objects of bounty, and to appreciate the relation of those factors and recollect the decision). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Hendricksongreen1 sentence1987State v. Hendrickson, 240 N.W.2d 846, 848 (N.D.1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kotteakos v. United States
green
2 sentences1977In so doing, we are cognizant that among the material factors to consider is ‘the relation of the error asserted to casting the balance for decision on the case as a whole.’ Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946). ...” 237 N.W.2d at 162 . 1977In so doing, we are cognizant that among the material factors to consider is ‘the relation of the error asserted to casting the balance for decision on the case as a whole.’ Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946). ...” 237 N.W.2d at 162 . | 2 | 1975–1977 |
State v. Allen
green
1 sentence1977In so doing, we are cognizant that among the material factors to consider is ‘the relation of the error asserted to casting the balance for decision on the case as a whole.’ Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946). ...” 237 N.W.2d at 162 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Hussman v. Durham
green
1 sentence1914(See also Hussman v. Durham, 165 U. S. 144 , 41 L. ed. 664, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 253; 16 Cyc. 1716.) The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the trial court is directed to enter a decree canceling the said mortgage and the records thereof as clouds on the title of the appellant, and quieting his title as against the respondent. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.