Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vignaroli v. Blue Cross of Iowagreen1 sentence1998Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 83 ; Holloway, 294 N.W.2d at 907 ; see also Rogelstad, 226 N.W.2d at 375 ; Vig-naroli, 360 N.W.2d at 744 (“No weight is required by the rule to be assigned by the trial court to any criteria listed, further evidencing an intent to grant considerable discretion to the trial court.”). | 1 | 1 |
Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'ngreen1 sentence1998Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 83 ; Holloway, 294 N.W.2d at 907 ; see also Rogelstad, 226 N.W.2d at 375 ; Vig-naroli, 360 N.W.2d at 744 (“No weight is required by the rule to be assigned by the trial court to any criteria listed, further evidencing an intent to grant considerable discretion to the trial court.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howe v. Microsoft Corp.
green
2 sentences2005Howe v. Microsoft Corp., 2003 ND 12, ¶ 9 , 656 N.W.2d 285 . 2005Howe v. Microsoft Corp., 2003 ND 12, ¶ 9 , 656 N.W.2d 285 . | 3 | 2004–2005 |
Peterson v. Dougherty Dawkins, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003Rose , at ¶ 9; Werlinger, 1999 ND *289 173, ¶ 56, 598 N.W.2d 820 ; Peterson, 1998 ND 159, ¶ 14 , 583 N.W.2d 626 . 2003Rose , at ¶ 9; Werlinger, 1999 ND *289 173, ¶ 56, 598 N.W.2d 820 ; Peterson, 1998 ND 159, ¶ 14 , 583 N.W.2d 626 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Rose v. United Equitable Insurance Co.
neutral
2 sentences2003Rose, 2002 ND 148, ¶ 9 , 651 N.W.2d 683 ; Klagues, 2002 ND 59, ¶ 8 , 643 N.W.2d 45 . 2003Rose, 2002 ND 148, ¶ 9 , 651 N.W.2d 683 ; Klagues, 2002 ND 59, ¶ 8 , 643 N.W.2d 45 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Klagues v. Maintenance Engineering
green
2 sentences2003Rose, 2002 ND 148, ¶ 9 , 651 N.W.2d 683 ; Klagues, 2002 ND 59, ¶ 8 , 643 N.W.2d 45 . 2003Rose, 2002 ND 148, ¶ 9 , 651 N.W.2d 683 ; Klagues, 2002 ND 59, ¶ 8 , 643 N.W.2d 45 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.
green
1 sentence2003Rose , at ¶ 9; Werlinger, 1999 ND *289 173, ¶ 56, 598 N.W.2d 820 ; Peterson, 1998 ND 159, ¶ 14 , 583 N.W.2d 626 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Brown v. Brown
green
2 sentences2001“An award of custody is a finding of fact, and this Court will not disturb a custody award unless it is clearly erroneous.” Brown v. Brown, 1999 ND 199, ¶ 10 , 600 N.W.2d 869 . [¶ 8] In considering the thirteen factors specified by N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1), the trial court found one — factor a — favored Kyle, and found seven — factors b, c, g, h, i, j, and 1 — favored neither of the parties. 2001“An award of custody is a finding of fact, and this Court will not disturb a custody award unless it is clearly erroneous.” Brown v. Brown, 1999 ND 199, ¶ 10 , 600 N.W.2d 869 . [¶ 8] In considering the thirteen factors specified by N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1), the trial court found one — factor a — favored Kyle, and found seven — factors b, c, g, h, i, j, and 1 — favored neither of the parties. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Old Broadway Corp. v. Hjelle
green
2 sentences1998Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 83 ; Holloway, 294 N.W.2d at 907 . [¶ 15] In most cases some of the thirteen factors will weigh against certification and some will weigh in favor. 1998Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 83 ; Holloway, 294 N.W.2d at 907 ; see also Rogelstad, 226 N.W.2d at 375 ; Vig-naroli, 360 N.W.2d at 744 (“No weight is required by the rule to be assigned by the trial court to any criteria listed, further evidencing an intent to grant considerable discretion to the trial court.”). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Holloway v. Blue Cross of North Dakota
green
2 sentences1998Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 83 ; Holloway, 294 N.W.2d at 907 . [¶ 15] In most cases some of the thirteen factors will weigh against certification and some will weigh in favor. 1998Old Broadway, 411 N.W.2d at 83 ; Holloway, 294 N.W.2d at 907 ; see also Rogelstad, 226 N.W.2d at 375 ; Vig-naroli, 360 N.W.2d at 744 (“No weight is required by the rule to be assigned by the trial court to any criteria listed, further evidencing an intent to grant considerable discretion to the trial court.”). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.