Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ten Stary Dom Partnership v. T. Brent Mauro (069079)green2 sentences2020In the absence of a constitutional or statutory violation, municipal action may be overturned only if it was "arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable." Ten Stary Dom P'ship v. Mauro, 216 N.J. 16, 33 (2013); Powerhouse Arts Dist. 2019See, e.g., Ten Stary Dom P'ship v. Mauro, 216 N.J. 16, 33 (2013); Powerhouse Arts Dist. | 2 | 2 |
Gilbert v. Gladdengreen1 sentence2021See Gilbert v. Gladden, 87 N.J. 275, 287 (1981) (noting "the selection of the manner in which elected representatives exercise their legitimate powers short of a constitutional or statutory violation cannot be remedied by the courts"). | 1 | 1 |
Padna v. City C'cil of Jersey Citygreen1 sentence2020Neighborhood Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey City, 413 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Smithgreen2 sentences2002However, as noted by the Justices whose view of civil retroactivity prevailed in Harper , the holding in Lemon II "concerned not the application of a new constitutional or statutory rule, but rather the relief that a federal court should award when applying the new law,” and that in remedy cases "consideration of reliance might be appropriate." American Trucking Assn. v. Smith, 496 U.S. 167, 223 , 110 S.Ct. 2323, 2355 , 110 L.Ed.2d 148, 189 (1990) (Stevens, J., dissenting). 2002However, as noted by the Justices whose view of civil retroactivity prevailed in Harper , the holding in Lemon II "concerned not the application of a new constitutional or statutory rule, but rather the relief that a federal court should award when applying the new law,” and that in remedy cases "consideration of reliance might be appropriate." American Trucking Assn. v. Smith, 496 U.S. 167, 223 , 110 S.Ct. 2323, 2355 , 110 L.Ed.2d 148, 189 (1990) (Stevens, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
Kligerman v. Lynchgreen2 sentences1981Kligerman v. Lynch, 92 N.J.Super. 373, 376-77 (Ch.Div.1966), ce rt. den., 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 49 , 19 L.Ed.2d 74 (1967). 1981Kligerman v. Lynch, 92 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kligerman v. Lynch
neutral
1 sentence1981Kligerman v. Lynch, 92 N.J.Super. 373, 376-77 (Ch.Div.1966), ce rt. den., 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 49 , 19 L.Ed.2d 74 (1967). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Smith v. Texas
green
1 sentence1981Kligerman v. Lynch, 92 N.J.Super. 373, 376-77 (Ch.Div.1966), ce rt. den., 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 49 , 19 L.Ed.2d 74 (1967). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County
green
2 sentences1954The conclusion is based on the principle that where it is impossible to secure both the standards of the true value, and the uniformity and equality required by law, the latter requirement is to be preferred as the just and ultimate purpose of the law.” Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U. S. 441 , 43 S. Ct. 190 , 67 L. 1954The conclusion is based on the principle that where it is impossible to secure both the standards of the true value, and the uniformity and equality required by law, the latter requirement is to be preferred as the just and ultimate purpose of the law.” Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota County, 260 U. S. 441 , 43 S. Ct. 190 , 67 L. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.