Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mavrikidis v. Petullogreen2 sentences2007Id. at 984 (observing that an exception exists when a principal engages an incompetent contractor). 2007Id. at 984 (observing that an exception exists when a principal engages an incompetent contractor). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Magbygreen2 sentences2000See Magby, 1998-NMSC-042 , 126 N.M. 361 , 969 P.2d 965 . 2000See Magby, 1998-NMSC-042 , 126 N.M. 361 , 969 P.2d 965 . | 2 | 2 |
Breen v. State Taxation & Revenue Departmentgreen1 sentence2022See 2012-NMCA-101, ¶ 34 . {22} Therefore, even if we were to assume for the sake of argument that Bibiji’s income tax returns are privileged, Bibiji waived the privilege by placing her tax liability at issue in litigation related to the attorney fees judgment. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Garcia
green
2 sentences2000The issue of self-defense was at the "foundation of the case" but, because the jury was properly instructed on and decided the issue of self-defense, we do not believe that the omission from the elements section "[took] from the defendant a right which was essential to his defense." Garcia, 46 N.M. at 309 , 128 P.2d at 462 . {15} This Court also addressed a claim of fundamental error in the context of a jury instruction case in State v. Osborne, 111 N.M. 654 , 808 P.2d 624 (1991). 2000The issue of self-defense was at the "foundation of the case" but, because the jury was properly instructed on and decided the issue of self-defense, we do not believe that the omission from the elements section "[took] from the defendant a right which was essential to his defense." Garcia, 46 N.M. at 309 , 128 P.2d at 462 . {15} This Court also addressed a claim of fundamental error in the context of a jury instruction case in State v. Osborne, 111 N.M. 654 , 808 P.2d 624 (1991). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Osborne
green
2 sentences2000The issue of self-defense was at the "foundation of the case" but, because the jury was properly instructed on and decided the issue of self-defense, we do not believe that the omission from the elements section "[took] from the defendant a right which was essential to his defense." Garcia, 46 N.M. at 309 , 128 P.2d at 462 . {15} This Court also addressed a claim of fundamental error in the context of a jury instruction case in State v. Osborne, 111 N.M. 654 , 808 P.2d 624 (1991). 2000The issue of self-defense was at the "foundation of the case" but, because the jury was properly instructed on and decided the issue of self-defense, we do not believe that the omission from the elements section "[took] from the defendant a right which was essential to his defense." Garcia, 46 N.M. at 309 , 128 P.2d at 462 . {15} This Court also addressed a claim of fundamental error in the context of a jury instruction case in State v. Osborne, 111 N.M. 654 , 808 P.2d 624 (1991). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.