specified exception in New Mexico

6 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Martinezgreen nm · 2007 · cited in 2 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015Confirmation That SLD Has Approved the Equipment On a Breath Alcohol Instrument Is Not Required by SLD Regulations and Is Not a Foundational Prerequisite to Admission of BAT Results {18} Our Supreme Court has held that, to meet foundational requirements under Rule 11-104(A), the State need not show strict compliance with all SLD regulations set forth in the Rule, but only with those regulations that are “accuracy-ensuring.” Martinez, 2007-NMSC-025, ¶ 11 (citing State v. Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶ 13 , 136 N.M. 561 , 102 P.3d 628 , overruled on other grounds by State v. Bullcoming, 2010-NMSC-007 2015Confirmation That SLD Has Approved the Equipment On a Breath Alcohol Instrument Is Not Required by SLD Regulations and Is Not a Foundational Prerequisite to Admission of BAT Results {18} Our Supreme Court has held that, to meet foundational requirements under Rule 11-104(A), the State need not show strict compliance with all SLD regulations set forth in the Rule, but only with those regulations that are “accuracy-ensuring.” Martinez, 2007-NMSC-025, ¶ 11 (citing State v. Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶ 13 , 136 N.M. 561 , 102 P.3d 628 , overruled on other grounds by State v. Bullcoming, 2010-NMSC-007	2	2
Espinoza Ex Rel. Espinoza v. Town of Taosgreen nm · 1995 · cited in 2 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Id. at 478 , 734 P.2d at 256 . {12} The Supreme Court reiterated this principle in Espinoza v. Town of Taos, where a child was injured on a public playground after falling from a slide while participating in a city-sponsored day camp. 120 N.M. 680, 681-82 , 905 P.2d 718, 719-20 (1995). 2012Id. at 478 , 734 P.2d at 256 . {12} The Supreme Court reiterated this principle in Espinoza v. Town of Taos, where a child was injured on a public playground after falling from a slide while participating in a city-sponsored day camp. 120 N.M. 680, 681-82 , 905 P.2d 718, 719-20 (1995).	2	2
Keeth Gas Co., Inc. v. Jackson Creek Cattle Co.green nm · 1977 · cited in 1 New Mexico opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985 2 sentences 1985DesGeorges v. Grainger, 76 N.M. 52 , 412 P.2d 6 (1966).” 91 N.M. at 91 , 570 P.2d at 922 (citations omitted). 1985DesGeorges v. Grainger, 76 N.M. 52 , 412 P.2d 6 (1966).” 91 N.M. at 91 , 570 P.2d at 922 (citations omitted).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Bullcoming green nm · 2010 2 sentences 2015Confirmation That SLD Has Approved the Equipment On a Breath Alcohol Instrument Is Not Required by SLD Regulations and Is Not a Foundational Prerequisite to Admission of BAT Results {18} Our Supreme Court has held that, to meet foundational requirements under Rule 11-104(A), the State need not show strict compliance with all SLD regulations set forth in the Rule, but only with those regulations that are “accuracy-ensuring.” Martinez, 2007-NMSC-025, ¶ 11 (citing State v. Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶ 13 , 136 N.M. 561 , 102 P.3d 628 , overruled on other grounds by State v. Bullcoming, 2010-NMSC-007 2015Confirmation That SLD Has Approved the Equipment On a Breath Alcohol Instrument Is Not Required by SLD Regulations and Is Not a Foundational Prerequisite to Admission of BAT Results {18} Our Supreme Court has held that, to meet foundational requirements under Rule 11-104(A), the State need not show strict compliance with all SLD regulations set forth in the Rule, but only with those regulations that are “accuracy-ensuring.” Martinez, 2007-NMSC-025, ¶ 11 (citing State v. Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶ 13 , 136 N.M. 561 , 102 P.3d 628 , overruled on other grounds by State v. Bullcoming, 2010-NMSC-007	2	2015–2015
State v. Dedman green nm · 2004 2 sentences 2015Confirmation That SLD Has Approved the Equipment On a Breath Alcohol Instrument Is Not Required by SLD Regulations and Is Not a Foundational Prerequisite to Admission of BAT Results {18} Our Supreme Court has held that, to meet foundational requirements under Rule 11-104(A), the State need not show strict compliance with all SLD regulations set forth in the Rule, but only with those regulations that are “accuracy-ensuring.” Martinez, 2007-NMSC-025, ¶ 11 (citing State v. Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶ 13 , 136 N.M. 561 , 102 P.3d 628 , overruled on other grounds by State v. Bullcoming, 2010-NMSC-007 2015Confirmation That SLD Has Approved the Equipment On a Breath Alcohol Instrument Is Not Required by SLD Regulations and Is Not a Foundational Prerequisite to Admission of BAT Results {18} Our Supreme Court has held that, to meet foundational requirements under Rule 11-104(A), the State need not show strict compliance with all SLD regulations set forth in the Rule, but only with those regulations that are “accuracy-ensuring.” Martinez, 2007-NMSC-025, ¶ 11 (citing State v. Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶ 13 , 136 N.M. 561 , 102 P.3d 628 , overruled on other grounds by State v. Bullcoming, 2010-NMSC-007	2	2015–2015
Pemberton v. Cordova green nmctapp · 1987 2 sentences 2012Id. at 478 , 734 P.2d at 256 . {12} The Supreme Court reiterated this principle in Espinoza v. Town of Taos, where a child was injured on a public playground after falling from a slide while participating in a city-sponsored day camp. 120 N.M. 680, 681-82 , 905 P.2d 718, 719-20 (1995). 2012Id. at 478 , 734 P.2d at 256 . {12} The Supreme Court reiterated this principle in Espinoza v. Town of Taos, where a child was injured on a public playground after falling from a slide while participating in a city-sponsored day camp. 120 N.M. 680, 681-82 , 905 P.2d 718, 719-20 (1995).	2	2012–2012
DesGeorges v. Grainger green nm · 1966 2 sentences 1985DesGeorges v. Grainger, 76 N.M. 52 , 412 P.2d 6 (1966).” 91 N.M. at 91 , 570 P.2d at 922 (citations omitted). 1985DesGeorges v. Grainger, 76 N.M. 52 , 412 P.2d 6 (1966).” 91 N.M. at 91 , 570 P.2d at 922 (citations omitted).	2	1977–1985

Where else courts name it

CA 145 (1919–2026) WY 25 (1985–2024) TX 12 (1967–2024) FL 12 (1975–2023) KS 10 (1905–2009) IL 8 (1980–2010) DE 7 (1973–2025) NY 7 (1876–2025) NE 6 (1989–2024) WA 6 (2013–2023) NM 6 (1977–2015) MI 6 (1976–2024) GA 5 (1922–2022) KY 5 (1953–2022) NJ 5 (1971–2026) NC 5 (1918–2023) PA 4 (1937–2024) UT 4 (1920–2011) MA 4 (1965–2018) OR 4 (1985–2011) OK 4 (1912–2024) LA 4 (1974–2012) ID 4 (1905–2014) TN 3 (1927–2012) DC 3 (1997–2017) AL 3 (1975–1993) IA 2 (1919–1977) WV 2 (2000–2002) CO 2 (1979–1995) IN 2 (1961–1983) VA 2 (1981–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check