specified factors in Illinois

2010Curtain, 75 Ill.

2010Curtin, 75 Ill.

1993The court observed: “Absent a sound basis to limit the number of possible defendants, the defendant here is but one of thousands of people who share these same characteristics.” (Harbold, 124 Ill.

1985In re Marriage of Carlson (1981), 101 Ill.

1985The test itself was not the primary concern of the legislature but was merely a safeguard to ensure that certified public accountants possessed the required competency. *140 The court therefore held that the test was merely an "antecedent event," and allowing accountants to qualify based upon a test administered prior to the effective date of the statute did not violate the constitutional rights of those accountants who had not taken or passed the test prior to the effective date of the statute. ( 4 Ill.2d 593, 597-98 .) Similarly, in the case at bar the legislature's primary concern was with

1985(In re Marriage of Shedbalkar (1981), 95 Ill.

1981App. 3d 617 , 402 N.E.2d 831 .) Section 602 does, however, require that the record contain sufficient evidence concerning the specified factors, which include: (1) the wishes of the child’s parent or parents as to his custody; (2) the wishes of the child as to his custodian; (3) the interaction and interrelationship of the child with his parent or parents, his siblings and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interest; (4) the child’s adjustment to his home, school and community; (5) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved; and (6) the physical viol

1980Stallings v. Stallings (1979), 75 Ill.

1980App. 3d 29 , 383 N.E.2d 266 .) The legislature could have provided for a 50-50 split of marital assets, but instead required the trier of fact to weigh the specified factors.