Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McCulley
green
2 sentences2024While the specified factors must be “accorded weight,” they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.” Id. at 147 , 939 N.W.2d at 381 . 2024While the specified factors must be “accorded weight,” they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.” Id. at 147 , 939 N.W.2d at 381 . | 3 | 2021–2024 |
State v. Hunt
green
2 sentences2020We have said that § 29-2260 is a directive to the trial court as to certain factors to be considered in imposing the sentence,13 but also that § 29-2260 does not control the trial court’s discretion in its conclusion reached as to the proper sentence to be imposed, after weighing the statutory factors.14 The specified factors must be “accorded weight,” but they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.”15 Our review of an alleged abuse of the sentencing judge’s discretion in refusing to withhold imprisonment under § 29-2260 must recognize the statutor 2020We have said that § 29-2260 is a directive to the trial court as to certain factors to be considered in imposing the sentence,13 but also that § 29-2260 does not control the trial court’s discretion in its conclusion reached as to the proper sentence to be imposed, after weighing the statutory factors.14 The specified factors must be “accorded weight,” but they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.”15 Our review of an alleged abuse of the sentencing judge’s discretion in refusing to withhold imprisonment under § 29-2260 must recognize the statutor | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Yost
green
2 sentences2020We have said that § 29-2260 is a directive to the trial court as to certain factors to be considered in imposing the sentence,13 but also that § 29-2260 does not control the trial court’s discretion in its conclusion reached as to the proper sentence to be imposed, after weighing the statutory factors.14 The specified factors must be “accorded weight,” but they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.”15 Our review of an alleged abuse of the sentencing judge’s discretion in refusing to withhold imprisonment under § 29-2260 must recognize the statutor 2020We have said that § 29-2260 is a directive to the trial court as to certain factors to be considered in imposing the sentence,13 but also that § 29-2260 does not control the trial court’s discretion in its conclusion reached as to the proper sentence to be imposed, after weighing the statutory factors.14 The specified factors must be “accorded weight,” but they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.”15 Our review of an alleged abuse of the sentencing judge’s discretion in refusing to withhold imprisonment under § 29-2260 must recognize the statutor | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Jallen
green
2 sentences2020We have said that § 29-2260 is a directive to the trial court as to certain factors to be considered in imposing the sentence,13 but also that § 29-2260 does not control the trial court’s discretion in its conclusion reached as to the proper sentence to be imposed, after weighing the statutory factors.14 The specified factors must be “accorded weight,” but they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.”15 Our review of an alleged abuse of the sentencing judge’s discretion in refusing to withhold imprisonment under § 29-2260 must recognize the statutor 2020We have said that § 29-2260 is a directive to the trial court as to certain factors to be considered in imposing the sentence,13 but also that § 29-2260 does not control the trial court’s discretion in its conclusion reached as to the proper sentence to be imposed, after weighing the statutory factors.14 The specified factors must be “accorded weight,” but they are neither exclusive of other factors nor “controlling the discretion of the court.”15 Our review of an alleged abuse of the sentencing judge’s discretion in refusing to withhold imprisonment under § 29-2260 must recognize the statutor | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Dowd v. Board of Equalization
green
2 sentences1999Dowd v. Board of Equal., 240 Neb. 437 , 482 N.W.2d 583 (1992); First Nat. 1999Dowd v. Board of Equal., 240 Neb. 437 , 482 N.W.2d 583 (1992); First Nat. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Spencer Holiday House, Inc. v. County Board of Equalization
green
2 sentences1989Affiliated Foods Co-op v. County of Madison, supra; Spencer Holiday House v. County Bd. of Equal., 220 Neb. 607 , 371 N.W.2d 286 (1985). 1989Affiliated Foods Co-op v. County of Madison, supra; Spencer Holiday House v. County Bd. of Equal., 220 Neb. 607 , 371 N.W.2d 286 (1985). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.