Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lewisgreen2 sentences2004See State v. Wilson, citing State v. Lewis (1982), 4 Ohio App.3d 275 , 448 N.E.2d 487 . {¶ 33} We review a trial court's determination of a witness' competency under an abuse of discretion standard. 2004See State v. Wilson, citing State v. Lewis (1982), 4 Ohio App.3d 275 , 448 N.E.2d 487 . {¶ 33} We review a trial court's determination of a witness' competency under an abuse of discretion standard. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2025See State v. Johnson, 2024-Ohio-1163, ¶ 32 (8th Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bradley
green
2 sentences2015Appellant’s first assignment of error is not well-taken. {¶ 27} A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is evaluated under the deficiency standard set forth in State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989), paragraphs two and three of the syllabus: 2. 2015Appellant’s first assignment of error is not well-taken. {¶ 27} A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is evaluated under the deficiency standard set forth in State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989), paragraphs two and three of the syllabus: 2. | 3 | 2012–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.