deficiency inquiry (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

deficiency inquiry in Arizona

5 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2024 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp.green
arizctapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp., 228 Ariz. 134, 137 , ¶ 7 n.2 (App. 2011) (noting appellate court’s discretionary authority to consider the merits of deficient briefs).

11
State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Biggergreen
ariz · 2021 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Bigger, 251 Ariz. at 407-08, ¶ 10 .

11
State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeligreen
ariz · 2017 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See State v. Pandeli, 242 Ariz. 175, 180, ¶ 5 (2017).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security green
arizctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2022We find again that this deficiency is a waiver of the challenge, Christina G., 227 Ariz. at 234 ¶ 14 n.6, and no abuse of discretion by the trial court is evident.

12022–2022
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance green
wash · 1967
2 sentences

1982Co., 70 Wash.2d 587 , 424 P.2d 648 (1967), for this conclusion, which suffers from the same deficiency in analysis.

1982Co., 70 Wash.2d 587 , 424 P.2d 648 (1967), for this conclusion, which suffers from the same deficiency in analysis.

11982–1982

Where else courts name it

TX 36 (1986–2022) FL 27 (1960–2019) CT 22 (1976–2022) IL 17 (1978–2026) CA 12 (1985–2026) PA 11 (1969–2025) NY 11 (1916–2006) GA 11 (1944–2025) ID 8 (2016–2024) NJ 8 (1934–2022) UT 8 (2020–2022) MI 7 (1988–2022) MO 7 (1932–2015) VT 6 (1915–2005) WA 6 (1971–2023) OH 6 (2003–2025) AZ 5 (1982–2024) LA 4 (1983–2015) AL 4 (1940–2002) IA 3 (1980–2026) WI 3 (1936–2025) TN 2 (1998–2001) IN 2 (1958–2018) MS 2 (1984–2002) NC 2 (2004–2023) MN 2 (1937–2010) OK 2 (1925–2020) NV 2 (1973–2018) KS 2 (1982–1996) OR 2 (1998–2016) DE 2 (2018–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check