Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Brackergreen2 sentences2023After finding that state jurisdiction was not pre-empted by federal law (in the case of a non-Indian defendant and an Indian victim in Indian country), the court utilized the analysis found in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker , 448 U.S. 136, 142-43 (1980), to determine whether "the exercise of state jurisdiction would unlawfully infringe upon tribal self-government." Id. , 142 S.Ct. at 2501 . 2023After finding that state jurisdiction was not pre-empted by federal law (in the case of a non-Indian defendant and an Indian victim in Indian country), the court utilized the analysis found in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker , 448 U.S. 136, 142-43 (1980), to determine whether "the exercise of state jurisdiction would unlawfully infringe upon tribal self-government." Id. , 142 S.Ct. at 2501 . | 3 | 3 |
Gilbert v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See OUJI-CR 2d 9-4 (1996)(“the law makes no distinction between the weight to be given to either direct or circumstantial evidence”); also see Gilbert v. State, 1997 OK CR 71 , 951 P.2d 98, 120 (where the prosecutor told the jury that circumstantial evidence should not be considered inferior to direct evidence, this Court held that the comment was a correct statement of the law). 2004See OUJI-CR 2d 9-4 (1996)(“the law makes no distinction between the weight to be given to either direct or circumstantial evidence”); also see Gilbert v. State, 1997 OK CR 71 , 951 P.2d 98, 120 (where the prosecutor told the jury that circumstantial evidence should not be considered inferior to direct evidence, this Court held that the comment was a correct statement of the law). | 1 | 1 |
Spuehler v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The same result would have been reached had this Court utilized the test found in Spuehler v. State, 1985 OK CR 132 , 709 P.2d 202, 203-04 . ¶ 11 There is no difference in the weight given circumstantial evidence or. direct evidence. 2004The same result would have been reached had this Court utilized the test found in Spuehler v. State, 1985 OK CR 132 , 709 P.2d 202, 203-04 . *559 ¶ 11 There is no difference in the weight given circumstantial evidence or direct evidence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dobry v. Dobry
green
2 sentences2016Investigation reveals some confusion because these actions are often mixed together under the concept of "accounting" without differentiating between them. 5 115 The trial court utilized the standard stated in Dobry v. Dobry, 1958 OK 8 , 324 P.2d 534 , as the basis for trial, However, Dobry governs in situations where a court must use its equitable powers to order an accounting because the plaintiff has no legal right to an accounting, but has no other adequate remedy for an injury. 2016Investigation reveals some confusion because these actions are often mixed together under the concept of "accounting" without differentiating between them. 5 115 The trial court utilized the standard stated in Dobry v. Dobry, 1958 OK 8 , 324 P.2d 534 , as the basis for trial, However, Dobry governs in situations where a court must use its equitable powers to order an accounting because the plaintiff has no legal right to an accounting, but has no other adequate remedy for an injury. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Anderson v. Vian Cemetery Ass'n
green
1 sentence1980In re Estate of Anderson, Okl.App., 571 P.2d 880 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.