Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1959–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. David A. Mowat & ML Mowat Co.
green
1 sentence2013Further, as particularly relevant here, we stated in Mowat that “[t]he federal courts have developed a body of law that has affected the adoption and interpretation of federal workplace safety rules” and explicitly relied on that body of law in fashioning the above-mentioned standard concerning whether a rule carries a presumption of hazardousness. 237 Or App at 580-82 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Guzek
green
2 sentences2005However, if the two statutes cannot be harmonized, ‘the specific statute is considered an exception to the general statute.’ ” State v. Guzek, 322 Or 245, 268 , 906 P2d 272 (1995) (citation omitted). 2005However, if the two statutes cannot be harmonized, ‘the specific statute is considered an exception to the general statute.’ ” State v. Guzek, 322 Or 245, 268 , 906 P2d 272 (1995) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State ex rel. Automobile Emporium, Inc. v. Murchison
green
2 sentences1984State ex rel *581 Automotive Emporium v. Murchison, 289 Or 673 , 616 P2d 496 (1980) (on denial of rehearing). 1984State ex rel *581 Automotive Emporium v. Murchison, 289 Or 673 , 616 P2d 496 (1980) (on denial of rehearing). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.
green
1 sentence1982The defense was properly stricken.” 52 Or App at 917-18 . *115 This was error. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Oregon v. Mathiason
green
2 sentences1977The United States Supreme Court, in Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492 , 97 S.Ct. 711 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714 , supra, was faced with a situation where the defendant had voluntarily come to a police station. 1977The United States Supreme Court, in Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 US 492 , supra, was faced with a situation where the defendant had voluntarily come to a police station. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Stose v. Heinrich
neutral
2 sentences1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. 1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGES
green
2 sentences1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. 1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Bramwell v. Rowland
green
2 sentences1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. 1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Suko v. Northwestern Ice & Cold Storage Co.
green
2 sentences1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. 1959Suko v. Northwestern Ice Co., 166 Or 557, 573 , 113 P2d 209 ; Bramwell v. Rowland, 123 Or 33, 49 , 261 P 57 .” This rule is followed in Stose v. Heinrich and Horseny, 199 Or 386, 390 , 261 P2d 675 , and in Tuite v. Union Pacific Stages et al., 204 Or 565, 596 , 284 P2d 333 . *453 Defendants’ exception to the above-mentioned instruction was not a proper exception and not sufficient to be considered by this court. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.