Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hopf v. Board of Review of City of Newportgreen2 sentences1997Id. at 428. 1997The Hopf case expressly limits the above-mentioned rule to cases where evidence is in conflict. 2 Id. | 2 | 3 |
Newton v. Tenneygreen1 sentence2023See Skylink Jets, Inc., 308 So. 3d at 1052- 54; Newton v. Tenney, 122 So. 3d 390, 392 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
R.T. Nielson Co. v. Cook
green
1 sentence2023However, the court also noted that the above- mentioned standard may permit a case-by-case evaluation and affords the trial court flexibility to handle unique circumstances “where both, or neither, parties may be considered to have prevailed.” Id. - 14 - Similar to Utah, Florida has also endorsed a flexible approach to determining the prevailing party in the context of breach-of-contract cases to afford the trial justice greater discretion when faced with a situation in which both parties or neither party may be considered to have prevailed. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Vose v. Broth. of Correctional Officers
green
1 sentence2003The City argues to this Court that the Arbitrator's interpretation of the Agreement falls under the above-mentioned exception and must therefore be void under the law of Vose . 587 A.2d 913 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Briggs
green
1 sentence2002Briggs, 787 A.2d at 486 . *924 In this case, however, defendant testified at the suppression hearing that he was receiving Social Security disability benefits as a result of his mental-health problems. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Criswell v. Bankers Mortgage Co.
green
1 sentence1950Criswell v. Bankers Mortgage Co., 128 Kan. 609 ; Williams v. Mayer, La. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Kelly v. Nichols
neutral
1 sentence1938Kelly v. Nichols, 17 R.I. 306 ; Sherman v. Baker, 20 R.I. 446 ; Shippee v. Industrial Trust Co., 43 R.I. 115 ; Todd v. St. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Sherman v. Baker
neutral
1 sentence1938Kelly v. Nichols, 17 R.I. 306 ; Sherman v. Baker, 20 R.I. 446 ; Shippee v. Industrial Trust Co., 43 R.I. 115 ; Todd v. St. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Shippee v. Industrial Trust Co.
neutral
1 sentence1938Kelly v. Nichols, 17 R.I. 306 ; Sherman v. Baker, 20 R.I. 446 ; Shippee v. Industrial Trust Co., 43 R.I. 115 ; Todd v. St. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.