hearsay exclusionary rule (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

hearsay exclusionary rule in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Primavera v. Celotex Corp.green
pasuperct · 1992 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–2019
2 sentences

2019Primavera v, Celotex Corporation, 415'Pa. Superior Ct. 41, 50, 608 A.2d 515, 518 (1992},petition for allowance ofappeal denied, 533 Pa. 641 , 622 A.2d 1374 (1993).

2019Primavera v, Celotex Corporation, 415'Pa. Superior Ct. 41, 50, 608 A.2d 515, 518 (1992},petition for allowance ofappeal denied, 533 Pa. 641 , 622 A.2d 1374 (1993).

33

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Harkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board neutral
pacommwct · 1986
2 sentences

1987Harkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Gulf Oil Corp.), 98 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 441 , 511 A.2d 927 (1986).

1987Harkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Gulf Oil Corp.), 98 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 441 , 511 A.2d 927 (1986).

21987–1987
Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc. green
pa · 1988
2 sentences

2016"One of the exceptions to the hearsay exclusionary rule pertains to declarations by a surveyor." Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc. , 376 Pa.Super. 260 , 545 A.2d 926 , 933 (1988).

2016"One of the exceptions to the hearsay exclusionary rule pertains to declarations by a surveyor." Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc. , 376 Pa.Super. 260 , 545 A.2d 926 , 933 (1988).

12016–2016
Laidley v. Rowe green
pa · 1923
2 sentences

2016"This exception holds that declarations of a deceased surveyor regarding a line surveyed are admissible in boundary disputes." Id. (citing Laidley v. Rowe , 275 Pa. 389 , 119 A. 474 , 477 (1923) ).

2016"This exception holds that declarations of a deceased surveyor regarding a line surveyed are admissible in boundary disputes." Id. (citing Laidley v. Rowe , 275 Pa. 389 , 119 A. 474 , 477 (1923) ).

12016–2016

Where else courts name it

TX 16 (2003–2025) LA 14 (1973–2024) MO 9 (1997–2004) IN 7 (1979–1997) CT 7 (1983–2010) PA 6 (1987–2019) OH 5 (2004–2020) NY 4 (1995–2012) OR 4 (2024–2025) CA 3 (2005–2021) TN 2 (1979–2024) MS 2 (2003–2005) NC 2 (2001–2010) WY 2 (2007–2009) HI 2 (2007–2020) AL 2 (1998–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check