hearsay exclusionary rule (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

hearsay exclusionary rule in Indiana

7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Brady v. Stategreen
ind · 1991 · cited in 4 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1992–1997
2 sentences

1997Brady v. State, 575 N.E.2d 981, 987 (Ind.1991).

1994Despite the admissibility of hearsay pursuant to an exception, "[elxeeptions to the hearsay exclusionary rule are not per se consistent with the State constitutional right to meet the witnesses face to face, but must be separately tested." Brady v. State (1991), Ind., 575 N.E.2d 981, 987 .

24

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Lynk v. State green
ind · 1979
2 sentences

1987Lynk v. State (1979), 271 Ind. 445 , 393 N.E.2d 751 .

1987Lynk v. State (1979), 271 Ind. 445 , 393 N.E.2d 751 .

11987–1987
Johnson v. State neutral
indctapp · 1985
1 sentence

1986Id.

11986–1986
Flewallen v. State green
ind · 1977
1 sentence

1979Fle wallen v. State (1977), Ind., 368 N.E.2d 239, 241 .

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

TX 16 (2003–2025) LA 14 (1973–2024) MO 9 (1997–2004) IN 7 (1979–1997) CT 7 (1983–2010) PA 6 (1987–2019) OH 5 (2004–2020) OR 4 (2024–2025) NY 4 (1995–2012) CA 3 (2005–2021) NC 2 (2001–2010) MS 2 (2003–2005) HI 2 (2007–2020) WY 2 (2007–2009) AL 2 (1998–2003) TN 2 (1979–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check