Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1894–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Stevensgreen2 sentences1985Cf. In re Stevens, 144 Vt. 250 , 478 A.2d 212, 217 (1984) (“We agree with the spirit of Justice Black’s *263 dissent [in Green v. United States, supra,] and will not make allocution under V.R.Cr.P. 32(a)(1) a hollow right. 1985Cf. In re Stevens, 144 Vt. 250 , 478 A.2d 212, 217 (1984) (“We agree with the spirit of Justice Black’s *263 dissent [in Green v. United States, supra,] and will not make allocution under V.R.Cr.P. 32(a)(1) a hollow right. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
green
1 sentence2025Did the trial court make an error of law and abuse its discretion when Judge Wall prosecuted her own contempt action in violation of law pursuant to Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 400 U.S. 455 (1971). 2. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Commonwealth v. Brady
green
1 sentence2021Did the trial court make an error of law by not granting a mistrial when a Commonwealth witness read a statement into evidence in violation of Commonwealth v. Brady, 507 A.2d 66 ([Pa. ]1986)[?] -5- J-A01043-21 Appellant’s Brief at 5 (trial court answers omitted). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Zeigler v. Zeigler
green
1 sentence2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Green v. United States
green
2 sentences1985Because Defendant was denied his right of allocution the sentence imposed in this case is invalid and the judgment of sentence must be vacated. 8 (Demetrius’ Brief at 27, 30 & n. 8) (Emphasis in original) Although not mentioned in the preceding passage, it requires noting that Demetrius cited Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301 , 81 S.Ct. 653 , 5 L.Ed.2d 670 (1961), Commonwealth v. Knighton, supra, and Rule 1405 to buttress his argument that, notwithstanding the query after sentencing, the failure of the court to make inquiry of him before sentencing rendered his right to speak, and any hope 1985Because Defendant was denied his right of allocution the sentence imposed in this case is invalid and the judgment of sentence must be vacated. 8 (Demetrius’ Brief at 27, 30 & n. 8) (Emphasis in original) Although not mentioned in the preceding passage, it requires noting that Demetrius cited Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301 , 81 S.Ct. 653 , 5 L.Ed.2d 670 (1961), Commonwealth v. Knighton, supra, and Rule 1405 to buttress his argument that, notwithstanding the query after sentencing, the failure of the court to make inquiry of him before sentencing rendered his right to speak, and any hope | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Barnosky v. Maroney
green
2 sentences1969Barnosky v. Maroney, 414 Pa. 161 , 199 A. 2d 424 (1964)] deals with the need for a court to make inquiry and satisfy itself that any guilty plea is voluntary and intelligently entered. 1969Barnosky v. Maroney, 414 Pa. 161 , 199 A. 2d 424 (1964)] deals with the need for a court to make inquiry and satisfy itself that any guilty plea is voluntary and intelligently entered. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Reese v. Reese
neutral
1 sentence1894To sustain the first assignment of error we should be required to hold that it is incompetent for a court to make a rule allowing a written instrument on which suit is brought to be admitted in evidence without proof of execution, when the execution has not been denied, or notice given that such proof would be required, and thus overrule Reese v. Reese, 90 Pa. 89 , and McGovern v. Hoesbach, 58 Pa. 176 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Corporation of Borough v. Neff
green
1 sentence1894The sustaining of the second assignment would overrule the decisions in Scranton City v. Barnes, 147 Pa. 461 , and Borough of Easton v. Neff, 102 Pa. 474 , and the line of cases to which these belong, and establish a new rule that an exception can be taken to the refusal of a court to enter a compulsory nonsuit. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Scranton City v. Barnes
neutral
1 sentence1894The sustaining of the second assignment would overrule the decisions in Scranton City v. Barnes, 147 Pa. 461 , and Borough of Easton v. Neff, 102 Pa. 474 , and the line of cases to which these belong, and establish a new rule that an exception can be taken to the refusal of a court to enter a compulsory nonsuit. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.