Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People in re J.Lgreen1 sentence2020See K.G., ¶ 25 (“Nor did the court make the required inquiry on the record as to any of the three parents, the guardian ad litem, or the Department.”); see also People in Interest of J.L., 2018 COA 11, ¶ 20 (“A written advisement form provided to one participant falls far short of meeting this requirement.”). ¶ 21 And at the time the Department sought termination, based on the existing record, the court had “reason to know” the child may have Indian heritage and should have required the Department to 7 send notice to the Jena Band. | 1 | 1 |
A.M. v. A.C.green1 sentence2016A.M. v. A.C., 2013 CO 16, ¶ 28 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corporationgreen2 sentences2009"The duty of a court reviewing agency action under the 'arbitrary or capricious standard is to ascertain whether the agency examined the relevant data and articulated a rational conmection between the facts found and the decision made." Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp., 42 F.3d 1560, 1574 (10th Cir.1994) (emphasis added) (footnote omitted). 'To enable a court to make this analysis, the agency must "make plain its course of inquiry, its analysis, and its reasoning." Id. at 1575 . 2009"The duty of a court reviewing agency action under the 'arbitrary or capricious standard is to ascertain whether the agency examined the relevant data and articulated a rational conmection between the facts found and the decision made." Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp., 42 F.3d 1560, 1574 (10th Cir.1994) (emphasis added) (footnote omitted). 'To enable a court to make this analysis, the agency must "make plain its course of inquiry, its analysis, and its reasoning." Id. at 1575 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Spinuzzi
green
2 sentences1963I adhere to what was said in People v. Spinuzzi, 149 Colo. 391 , 369 P. (2d) 427 , that courts should proceed with extreme caution in permitting bail in a capital case, but this in itself does not permit the court to dispense with the determination which the Constitution prescribes. 1963I adhere to what was said in People v. Spinuzzi, 149 Colo. 391 , 369 P. (2d) 427 , that courts should proceed with extreme caution in permitting bail in a capital case, but this in itself does not permit the court to dispense with the determination which the Constitution prescribes. | 2 | 1963–1963 |
Ex parte McAnally
green
2 sentences1963My judgment in this is strengthened by the fact that the court cites with approval from Ex parte McAnally, 53 Ala. 495 , which requires the court to make the inquiry and to determine whether the proof is evident or the presumption great. 1963My judgment in this is strengthened by the fact that the court cites with approval from Ex parte McAnally, 53 Ala. 495 , which requires the court to make the inquiry and to determine whether the proof is evident or the presumption great. | 2 | 1963–1963 |
Farmers' High Line & Reservoir Co. v. Wolf
neutral
2 sentences1961The statutes in point of diversion proceedings have been described as sui generis, Farmers’ High Line & Reservoir Co. v. Wolf, 23 Colo. App. 570 , 131 Pac. 291 . 1961The statutes in point of diversion proceedings have been described as sui generis, Farmers’ High Line & Reservoir Co. v. Wolf, 23 Colo. App. 570 , 131 Pac. 291 . | 2 | 1961–1961 |
People v. Edebohls
green
1 sentence2009Nor did the trial court make an inquiry into the potential conflict or "seek from the defendant a narrative response, on the record, indicating his or her understanding of the right to conflict-free representation and a description of the conflict at issue" while "actively seek[ing] to clarify any confusion the defendant may have about the advisement." Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.