make inquiry (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

make inquiry in Indiana

6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1878–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Smith v. . Tracygreen
ny · 1867 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1917–1917
1 sentence

1917See, also, Smith v. Tracy (1867), 36 N. Y. 79 . ‘ ‘ Generally speaking it does not devolve upon the principal to make inquiry as to the facts.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Adam Horton v. State of Indiana green
ind · 2016
2 sentences

2016Although the State asked the Court to make an exception “where circumstances nevertheless imply waiver was the defendant’s choice” — such as where “Horton had just experienced a jury trial and thus was probably ‘aware’ of the right his attorney waived on his behalf’ — the Court “decline[d] to carve out an exception.” Id. at 1159 , 2016 WL 1612335 .

2016Although the State asked the Court to make an exception “where circumstances nevertheless imply waiver was the defendant’s choice” — such as where “Horton had just experienced a jury trial and thus was probably ‘aware’ of the right his attorney waived on his behalf’ — the Court “decline[d] to carve out an exception.” Id. at 1159 , 2016 WL 1612335 .

12016–2016
Farthing v. Farthing green
indctapp · 1978
2 sentences

1988We therefore conclude that the statute merely directs the court to consider these factors, not to make special findings prior to awarding attorney's fees. 3 In reaching this conclusion, we draw upon Farthing v. Farthing (1979) 2d Dist., 178 Ind.App. 336 , 382 N.E.2d 941, 944 , trans. denied, in which we stated: "The statute [LC. 31-1-11.5-9(c) (Burns Code Ed.Supp.1978) ] merely compels the trial court to make inquiry and 'find' whether there exists incapacity and material effect upon the spouse's self-supportive ability before awarding maintenance.

1988We therefore conclude that the statute merely directs the court to consider these factors, not to make special findings prior to awarding attorney's fees. 3 In reaching this conclusion, we draw upon Farthing v. Farthing (1979) 2d Dist., 178 Ind.App. 336 , 382 N.E.2d 941, 944 , trans. denied, in which we stated: "The statute [LC. 31-1-11.5-9(c) (Burns Code Ed.Supp.1978) ] merely compels the trial court to make inquiry and 'find' whether there exists incapacity and material effect upon the spouse's self-supportive ability before awarding maintenance.

11988–1988
Temple v. Temple green
indctapp · 1975
1 sentence

1978While there is no direct authority with respect to the necessity of express findings pursuant to the requirements of I.C. 31-1-11.5-9(c), we nevertheless conclude that when, as here, the trial court expressly designates the award as maintenance, neither I.C. 31-1-11.5-9(c) nor Temple v. Temple, supra, 328 N.E.2d 227 , require special findings of fact. 2 The statute merely compels the trial court to make inquiry and “find” whether there exists incapacity and material effect upon the spouse’s self-supportive ability before awarding maintenance.

11978–1978
In re of Appraisal of the Estate of Buchanan neutral
nyappdiv · 1918
2 sentences

1920In the case of Matter of Buchanan (1918), 184 App. Div. 237 , 171 N. Y.

1920In the case of Matter of Buchanan (1918), 184 App. Div. 237 , 171 N. Y.

11920–1920
Abbott v. Zeigler green
ind · 1857
1 sentence

1878Abbott v. Zeigler, 9 Ind. 511 .

11878–1878

Where else courts name it

IL 28 (1912–2026) NY 20 (1940–2021) CA 17 (1948–2019) FL 11 (1906–2025) AR 11 (1984–2022) NC 10 (1935–2026) CO 8 (1961–2020) PA 6 (1894–2025) IN 6 (1878–2016) GA 6 (2007–2026) TX 6 (1965–2018) WA 5 (1941–2020) MI 4 (1897–2026) IA 4 (1975–2023) MO 3 (1971–1996) NJ 3 (1995–1996) KS 3 (1935–1964) NM 3 (1901–2004) WI 3 (1882–1987) CT 3 (1990–2012) ND 2 (1934–2026) LA 2 (1844–1994) OK 2 (1912–1942) VA 2 (1989–2004) KY 2 (1999–2021) MT 2 (1910–1990) ID 2 (1970–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check