petition for writ error in Pennsylvania

2018Appellant timely appealed and both the trial court and Appellant have complied with ____________________________________________ 2 A petition for writ of error coram nobis “is generally available to challenge the validity of a judgment based on facts not before the court when the judgment was entered.” Commonwealth v. Sheehan, 285 A.2d 465, 467 (Pa. 1971). 3 From his petition, it is unclear the change in law to which Appellant refers. -2- J-A10044-18 Pa.R.A.P. 1925.

2017Appellant raises the following issues for our review: ____________________________________________ 3 A petition for writ of error coram nobis “is generally available to challenge the validity of a judgment based on facts not before the court when the judgment was entered.” Commonwealth v. Sheehan, 285 A.2d 465, 467 (Pa. 1971). 4 Miranda v. Arizona, 86 S.Ct. 1602 (1966). -2- J-S16026-17 1.

2020As stated by the Superior Court in Commonwealth v. Taylor, 165 A.2d 390, 391 (Pa. Super. 1960), “a petition for writ of error coram nobis . . . cannot be used as . . . a substitute for an appeal.” 20 (“Failure to timely appeal an administrative agency’s action is a jurisdictional defect . . . .”).

1962This court, per Dannehower, P. J., denied the writ and dismissed the petition, stating: “At the trial, he (petitioner) was represented by able and competent counsel, and no motion for a new trial or in arrest of judgment were filed. “ ‘The writ of error coram nobis lies where some fact exists outside of the record, which fact was not known at the time the judgment was rendered, through no' fault of the petitioner, and which fact, if known, would have prevented judgment.’ Commonwealth v. Taylor, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 360 . (syllabus) “A petitioner for a writ of coram nobis, or writ of habeas cor

2016See Commonwealth v. Descardes, 101 A.3d 105, 109 (Pa. Super. 2014).