Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agencygreen2 sentences1997See Corrado , 117 R.I. at 654 . 1979See Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency, 117 R.I. at 657 , 370 A.2d at 231 . | 2 | 2 |
Louis Paolino v. Joseph Ferreiragreen1 sentence2024See Paolino I, 153 A.3d at 515-16 ; Restatement (Second) Judgments § 27. | 1 | 1 |
Cullen v. Tarinigreen1 sentence2014See Cullen, 15 A.3d at 982 (emphasizing that balancing of the equities is appropriate only “in extraordinary cases”); Adams, 508 A.2d at 401 (holding that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny mandatory injunction to remove encroachment from the plaintiffs property where there was nothing in the record to indicate that any circumstances would make injunctive relief inequitable). | 1 | 1 |
Adams v. Torogreen1 sentence2014See Cullen, 15 A.3d at 982 (emphasizing that balancing of the equities is appropriate only “in extraordinary cases”); Adams, 508 A.2d at 401 (holding that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny mandatory injunction to remove encroachment from the plaintiffs property where there was nothing in the record to indicate that any circumstances would make injunctive relief inequitable). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Claim of Becker v. Taylor & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1930Sangamon Mining Co. v. Industrial Com., 315 Ill. 532 ; Becker v. Taylor & Co., 216 N. Y. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Sangamon County Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission
neutral
1 sentence1930Sangamon Mining Co. v. Industrial Com., 315 Ill. 532 ; Becker v. Taylor & Co., 216 N. Y. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Pettingill v. Jones
neutral
1 sentence1924Other cases approving a departure from the general rule are: Mason v. Sieglitz, 22 Colo. 320, at 326 ; Wright v. Cumpsty, 41 Pa. St. 102; Pettingill v. Jones, 28 Kan. 749 ; Wheeler v. Arnold, 30 Mich. 304 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Mason v. Sieglitz
neutral
1 sentence1924Other cases approving a departure from the general rule are: Mason v. Sieglitz, 22 Colo. 320, at 326 ; Wright v. Cumpsty, 41 Pa. St. 102; Pettingill v. Jones, 28 Kan. 749 ; Wheeler v. Arnold, 30 Mich. 304 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Wheeler v. Arnold
green
1 sentence1924Other cases approving a departure from the general rule are: Mason v. Sieglitz, 22 Colo. 320, at 326 ; Wright v. Cumpsty, 41 Pa. St. 102; Pettingill v. Jones, 28 Kan. 749 ; Wheeler v. Arnold, 30 Mich. 304 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.